Dating apps are supposed to help you meet people. So why are we spending weeks texting someone before we’ll agree to actually meet?
In this episode of The Realistic Romantic, I’m breaking down one of the biggest mistakes I see in modern dating: treating dating apps like an investigation instead of an introduction.
We start with a Dear Drew pulled from Reddit. A woman asks a guy to lunch shortly after they match. He says he wants to “get to know her” first. She unmatches him, and suddenly he’s questioning her motives.
But isn’t going to lunch part of getting to know someone?
We’ll talk about dating app pen pals, false familiarity, vulnerability, and why you can’t remove all the risk from dating. Sometimes you don’t need another two weeks of messages. You just need lunch.
IN THIS EPISODE
• Why dating apps are for introductions
• The Introduction → Date → Reflection framework
• The Pre-Date Paradox
• Why texting can create false familiarity
• Why you can’t eliminate risk from dating
CHAPTERS
00:00 DATING APPS ARE FOR INTRODUCTIONS
02:30 DEAR DREW: “WAS I THE RED FLAG?”
06:38 DATING APPS ARE FOR INTRODUCTIONS
08:17 DATING APP FRAMEWORK: INTRODUCTION → DATE → REFLECTION
15:05 THE PRE-DATE PARADOX 21:13 YOU CANNOT REMOVE THE RISK FROM DATING
Take the 48-Hour IRL Challenge. If you match with someone you’re interested in and comfortable meeting, move the conversation toward a real date within 48 hours instead of becoming dating app pen pals.
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör
Drew Henry | Attraction & Relationship Expert. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Drew Henry | Attraction & Relationship Expert och inte av,
eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.