35. Il Pirahã: una lingua minuscola, un casino enorme

Il Pirahã. Lingua remota e parlata da pochissime persone, eppure capace di scatenare dibattiti infuocati nella comunità linguistica. Tra assurdità sintattiche, ricorsività, sistema numerico e controversie nate dalle ricerche di Dan Everett, ci chiediamo se davvero il Pirahã sia un caso più unico che raro tra le lingue del mondo.  

Grafiche: Gianluca La Bruna

La sigla è stata prodotta da White Hot e fornita da https://freebeats.io

FONTI:

• Agrillo C. (2012). Evidence for two numerical systems that are similar in humans and guppies. PLOS ONE, 7(2):e31923.
• Campbell L. (2012). Classification of the indigenous languages of South America. In V. Grondona & L. Campbell (Eds.). The Indigenous Languages of South America. The World of Linguistics. Vol. 2. (pp. 59-166). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
• Chelliah S., & de Reuse (2011) Handbook of Descriptive linguistic fieldwork.  New York: Springer.
• Chomsky N. (1980). Rules and representations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1):1–15.
• Colapinto J. (2007): The Interpreter. The New Yorker, 16, 125.
• Epps P. (2005). Language endangerment in Amazonia: The role of missionaries. In J. Wohlgemuth & T. Dirksmeyer (Eds.), Bedrohte Vielfalt: aspects of language death (pp. 311-327). Berlin: Weinßensee Verlag.
• Epps P. & Lev M. (2023). Amazonian languages: language isolates. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.  
• Errington J. (2008). Linguistics in a colonial world: a story of language, meaning, and power. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Everett D.L. (1992). A Língua Pirahã e a Teoria da Sintaxe: Descrição, Perspectivas e Teoria (Ph.D. thesis). Institute of Language Studies at the State University of Campinas: Editora Unicamp.  chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://etnolinguistica.wdfiles.com/local--files/tese%3Aeverett-1983/Everett_1983_A_lingua_Piraha_e_a_teoria_da_sintaxe.pdf  
• Everett D.L. (2001). Monolingual field research. In P. Newman & M. Ratliff (Eds.), Linguistic Fieldwork (pp. 166–188). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Everett D.L. (2005). Cultural Constraints on Grammar and Cognition in Pirahã: Another Look at the Design Features of Human Language. Current Anthropology, 46:621–646.
• Everett D.L. (2008). Don't sleep, there are snakes. New York: Pantheon Books.
• Everett D.L. (2010). You drink. You drive. You go to jail. Where's recursion? chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://daneverettbooks.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/everett_10_You-drink-You-.pdf
• Everett D. L. (2012). What does Pirahã grammar have to teach us about human language and the mind? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 3(6):555–563.
• Frank M.C., Everett D.L., Fedorenko E., & Gibson E. (2008). Number as a cognitive technology: evidence from Pirahã language and cognition. Cognition, 108(3):819–824.
• Futrell R., Stearns L., Everett, D.L., Piantadosi S.T., & Gibson E. (2016). A corpus investigation of syntactic embedding in Pirahã. PLoS ONE, 11(3).   
• Gordon P.  (2004). Numerical cognition without words: evidence from Amazonia. Science, 306(5695):496–499.  
• Hauser M.D., Carey S., & Hauser L.B. (2000). Spontaneous number representation in semi–free–ranging rhesus monkeys. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Biological Sciences, 267(1445): 829–833.
• Horák M., Uhrin M., & Amaral A.P. (2023) Status of the current scientific knowledge on Pirahã: what is known and what could be studied in future? Anthropologia Integra 14(2):25-33.
• Hou J., Wang Y., Zhang Y., & Wang D. (2022). How do scholars and non-scholars participate in dataset dissemination on Twitter. Journal of Informetrics, 16(1):101223. 
• Hvalkof S., Aaby P. (1981). Is God an American? An anthropological perspective on the missionary work of the Summer Institute of Linguistics. Copenhagen/London: A Survival International Document, International Workgroup for Indigenous Affairs.
• Hyde D.C. (2010). Near-infrared spectroscopy shows right parietal specialization for number in pre-verbal infants. NeuroImage., 53(2):647–652.
• Kocab A., Senghas A., Coppola M., & Snedeker J. (2023). Potentially recursive structures emerge quickly when a new language community forms. Cognition, 232(105261).
• Nevins A., Pesetsky D., & Rodrigues C. (2009). Evidence and argumentation: a reply to Everett. Language, 2009;85(3):671–681.
• Nevins A., Pesetsky D., & Rodrigues C. (2009). Pirahã exceptionality: a reassessment. Language, 85:355–404.  
• Overmann K.A. (2021). Numerical origins: the critical questions. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 21(5):449–468.
• Pessoa L., & Desimone R. (2003). From humble neural beginnings comes knowledge of numbers. Neuron, 37(1):4–6.
• Piazza M. (2004). Tuning curves for approximate numerosity in the human parietal cortex. Neuron, 44(3):547–555.  
• Piazza M. (2010). Neurocognitive start-up tools for symbolic number representations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(12):542–551.  
• Pullum G.K. (2004). The Straight Ones: Dan Everett on the Pirahã. Language Log http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/001387.html
• Pullum G.K. (2024). Daniel Everett on Pirahã syntax. In E. Gibson & M. Poliak (Eds.), From fieldwork to linguistic theory: a tribute to Dan Everett (pp. 23-74). Berlin: Language Science Press. 
• Reboul A. (2012): Language: between Cognition, communication and culture. Pragmatics & Cognition, 20(2):295–316. 
• Reboul A. (2017): A pragmatic and philosophical examination of Everett’s claims about Pirahã. In J. Blochowiak, C. Grisot, S. Durrleman, & C. Leanzlinger (Eds.). Formal Models in the Study of Language Applications in Interdisciplinary Contexts (pp. 84–96). New York: Springer.
• Rodrigues C. (2017). Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence: the Pirahã case. Revista Diadorim, 19:305–324. 
• Rodrigues C., Salles R., & Sandalo F. (2018). Word order in control: evidence for self-embedding in Pirahã. In L. Amaral, M. Maia, A. Nevins, & T. Roeper (Eds.), Recursion across domains (pp. 111-126). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Sauerland U. (2015). False speech reports in Pirahã: a comprehension experiment. In L. Amaral, M. Maia, A. Nevins, & T. Roeper T (Eds.). Recursion and embedding in Brazilian languages and beyond (pp. 21-34). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Sergeyev Y.D. (2022). Some paradoxes of infinity revisited. Mediterranean Journal of Mathematics, 19(3).
• Sousa D. (2010). Mind, brain, and education: neuroscience implications for the classroom. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
• Thomas M. (2020). The monolingual approach in American linguistic fieldwork. Historiographia Linguistica, 47(2–3): 266–302. 
• Woelfle M., Olliaro P., Todd M.H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10):745–748.