The “3 runs per week” debate is making the rounds again, with runners sharing stories about how cutting back their running helped them get faster, stay injury-free, and finally hit a big PR.
But there’s an important piece of context that often gets left out.
A runner with 10–15 years and thousands of miles under their belt can thrive on three runs per week for very different reasons than a newer runner training for their first half or full marathon.
In this episode, we’re breaking down why there isn’t one “ideal” running frequency, and why copying someone else’s training schedule without considering their running history can backfire.
We discuss:
Why running frequency and total running volume aren’t the same thing
How years of easy mileage build an aerobic foundation you can’t shortcut
Why an experienced runner might get faster by temporarily running less
Why a newer runner may actually need MORE running to improve
The relationship between training volume, intensity, recovery, and performance
How strength training and cross-training fit into the equation
Why marathon “durability” matters, and what your training has to do with falling apart late in a race
When focusing on your 5K speed could eventually make you a better marathoner
How to decide whether 3, 4, 5, or 6 runs per week makes sense for YOU
The goal isn’t to run as much—or as little—as possible. It’s to find the amount of running that gives your body the stimulus it needs while still allowing you to recover, stay consistent, and actually get better.
Looking for the resources mentioned in today's episode?
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör
Stephanie Hnatiuk. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Stephanie Hnatiuk och inte av,
eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.
