Every quantum warning ends with the same advice: move your coins to a fresh address and wait it out. But if someone can break the cryptography protecting a single large wallet, every holder feels it, whether their own coins move or not. So what can an individual Bitcoin holder actually do, and is quantum even the biggest risk? In the 11th episode of The Quantum Bitcoin Podcast, Bitcoin historian Pete Rizzo put that question to Nic Carter, founding partner at Castle Island Ventures and a longtime Bitcoin investor and researcher who has spent the last 18 months pressing developers to prepare, and who argues that cryptography's golden age is over and Bitcoin has entered the danger zone.Episode 11 is the one that asks what protection really means: why Nic says no single holder can make themselves safe from a break in elliptic curves, why an AI-driven classical break worries him more today than a working quantum computer, and why Bitcoin has to move away from hard-coded cryptography toward a design built to swap schemes as they fail. He grades the last year of developer work a 6 out of 10, explains why stateful schemes like SHRINCS have met resistance, and makes the case that the block size fight will look small once hash-based signatures arrive. It covers how a break would force Bitcoin's founding principles into conflict, from the 21 million supply to the rule that a valid signature proves ownership, his best case for an orderly salvage of abandoned coins, why he sees no problem with commercial firms helping the migration, and what the largest Wall Street firms tell him about their top concern. It closes with his read on Q-Day timelines, why Shor's algorithm is likely to arrive before the rest of quantum's benefits, and why he remains optimistic that Bitcoin can get through it if the work starts now.The Quantum Bitcoin Podcast is a series examining the quantum threat to Bitcoin, designed to be watched in sequence. Each episode opens with a discussion between the hosts, presents extended interviews with expert guests on a single key question, and closes with a recap of how the evidence has changed their thinking.Links referenced:Castle Island Ventures - https://castleisland.vc/Project Eleven - [link]Justin Drake's fresh-address warning - [link]Vitalik Buterin's post on hash-based signatures - [link]https://www.nist.gov/pqcryptoCryptography and physicshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliptic-curve_cryptographyhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliptic_Curve_Digital_Signature_Algorithmhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discrete_logarithmhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shor%27s_algorithmhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-quantum_cryptographyhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hash-based_cryptographyhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptographic_agilityhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SegWitGUESTSNic Carter is a founding partner at Castle Island Ventures, a venture firm focused on public blockchains, and a co-founder of Coin Metrics, a blockchain data company. He was previously the first cryptoasset analyst at Fidelity Investments. He writes widely on Bitcoin's design, monetary policy and governance, and has been one of the most vocal advocates for preparing Bitcoin for the quantum threat.FOLLOWThe Quantum Bitcoin Podcast: https://www.youtube.com/@QuantumBitcoinPodcastPete Rizzo: https://x.com/pete_rizzo_Nic Carter: https://x.com/nic__carterNew episodes release weekly. Subscribe to follow the full series.

Rss
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör The Bitcoin Historian. Innehållet i podden är skapat av The Bitcoin Historian och inte av, eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.