Part of a series examining free birth and home birth culture in light of a recent media exposé (The Guardian's investigation), this conversation features veteran obstetrician Dr. Stu Fischbein giving his unfiltered take on why free birth exists, why he believes it's here to stay, and where he thinks the modern maternity system has gone wrong. Drawing on nearly 40 years in practice — including 25 years working alongside midwives and a career spent specializing in breech, twin, and VBAC deliveries — Dr. Stu makes the case that many of the "rules" of obstetrics (age 35, 24-hour rupture of membranes, post-dates, standard of care) are arbitrary constructs rather than evidence-based thresholds. The conversation ranges widely: informed consent, financial incentives in hospital billing, breech and twin birth outcomes, ultrasound overuse, newborn resuscitation practices, and why he believes women are turning to free birth not out of recklessness but as a rational response to a system they no longer trust.
This Episode Is Supported By
INBLUEM Skincare Pure, plant-based skincare made in Byron Bay — no toxins, no fillers, no fuss. In Bloom is offering Return to Wisdom listeners a discount. 👉 Use code RETURNTOWISDOMPODCAST at inbluem.com/returntowisdompodcast
Kim Anami Holistic sex and relationship coaching for reconnecting with your body and your partner. https://kimanami.ontraport.com/t?orid=511555&opid=2 to register for courses— using it also supports the podcast.
This Episode is brought to you by Superfeast
Enjoy 10% off your order with the code RETURNTOWISDOM
https://www.superfeast.com.au/
Topics Covered
Reactions to The Guardian's free birth investigation — what it got right and where it fell short
Why Dr. Stu believes free birth is "here to stay" and will keep growing
The financial and liability incentives baked into hospital birth (C-section pay structures, NICU admissions, billing for extra ultrasound features)
Informed consent vs. "motivational interviewing" (his term for coercive counseling)
Rupture of membranes: is the 24-hour rule evidence-based?
Meconium: what it actually indicates vs. how it's used to justify intervention
Where "age 35 = high risk" actually came from (the amniocentesis/Down syndrome coincidence)
"Post-dates" vs. term — and why 42 weeks isn't inherently dangerous
Vaginal breech and twin delivery: the data, the de-skilling of OBs, and why cesarean isn't a risk-free alternative
Ultrasound overuse, Doppler billing incentives, and the precautionary principle
Delayed cord clamping and newborn resuscitation on the mother vs. at the warmer
How to "interview" an OB or hospital before choosing where to give birth
Why podcasting has become a major source of birth information — and why the medical establishment doesn't like that
Dr. Stu's own birth story and how it shaped his views on maternal-infant bonding
Resources Mentioned
Dr. Stu's papers via birthinginstincts.com: Home Birth with an Obstetrician, home breech birth paper, home twin birth paper (with Rixa Freeze, Breech Without Borders)
The Guardian's free birth investigative series
An Inconvenient Study (documentary referenced re: vaccinated/unvaccinated health outcomes)
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) Green-top Guideline on breech birth (2017)
Breech Without Borders training seminars
The Birthing Instincts podcast and Patreon community
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör
Keshia Tognazzini. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Keshia Tognazzini och inte av,
eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.
