What can a fictional, addicted, borderline-unbearable doctor show us about stalled strategy projects?
When we have a small baby, our TV diet needs to be relatively unchallenging, and we recently rediscovered House. And got talking about how their "differential diagnosis" — that whiteboard full of things the disease might be — is basically our Signals > Stories > Options stuff but with apparent misanthropy and a gammy leg.
In this one we feel our way through what happens when you stop trying to be right and start trying to be interestingly wrong. Featuring split-brain patients, a red herring tomato sauce, and tfw a video camera destroys all your assumptions about how you're dancing.
Why the first story you settle on almost always blinds you to everything else
Why "the problem is a lack of X" is smuggling in a pre-determined solution. Dig more ("imagine you have X, now what happens?")
Performative ideation and how to tell the difference between a real differential and people making noises in a workshop
Everybody lies, and it's often got nothing to do with active dishonesty
The illusion of explanatory depth ... go on then, you draw a bicycle from memory and see how you get on
Knowledge shields and the painful, essential, wondrous experience of watching yourself on video
For anyone who's ever sat in a meeting where everyone's certain and the ideas feel like they're on predetermined rails.
References
House M.D. (TV series) Dr Gregory House, played by Hugh Laurie; Dr Wilson as the Watson figure
Sherlock Holmes — Arthur Conan Doyle, cited as House's explicit origin
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör
Tom Kerwin. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Tom Kerwin och inte av,
eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.