This week is a research deep dive. ReFiBuy commissioned a behavioral study of how real people shop inside ChatGPT and Google's AI Mode, and Scot sat down with the researcher who ran it to walk through what was found. The full study is published today This is the conversation behind the numbers.
Highlights:Â
ðŽð°% ðŒð³ ð°ðµðŒð¶ð°ð²ð ððð®ð¿ð ðŒð» ð® ð°ð®ð¿ð±: About 84% of product choices in the study came from a product card. That's 83.7%, and Scot rounds it up "if you allow."
ð£ðŒðð¶ðð¶ðŒð» ððµð¿ð²ð² ð¯ð²ð®ðð ðœðŒðð¶ðð¶ðŒð» ðððŒ: The first card wins by a wide margin, with roughly 43% of picks. But card three outperformed card two in both ChatGPT and AI Mode. Eric's take is that "it's not really a ranking." Scot's guess is curiosity, because card three is only partly visible in the carousel.
ð£ð¶ð°ððð¿ð²ð ð¯ð²ð³ðŒð¿ð² ðœð®ð¿ð®ðŽð¿ð®ðœðµð: About 75% of shoppers skipped the AI's written answer and went straight to the product cards. They'd come back to the text later, but only as a second step.
ðµðŽ% ðŒð³ ðŸðð²ð¿ð¶ð²ð ðð¿ð¶ðŽðŽð²ð¿ð²ð± ð°ð®ð¿ð±ð: Purchase-intent prompts like "I want to buy X today" brought up product cards almost every time.
ð§ðµð² ð³ð¶ð¿ðð ðŒð³ð³ð²ð¿ ðð¶ð»ð: When shoppers had to click out to a retailer, they leaned even harder toward the first offer than toward the first product card. The likeliest path is first card, first offer.
ðð±ð ððµð®ð ðœð²ðŒðœð¹ð² ð®ð°ððð®ð¹ð¹ð ð¹ð¶ðžð²: About 6 in 10 free-plan users saw ads or sponsored content on a task. 71% rated them at least as useful as Google search ads, and about 35% said an ad influenced what they considered buying.
ð§ðµð² ð¿ð²ðð¶ð²ðð ðœð®ð¿ð®ð±ðŒð : Reviews were the main reason for a pick only 2% of the time. Afterward, about 75% said reviews mattered. Scot's explanation is that nobody reads them, but everyone takes the 4.8 over the 3.2.
ð§ð¿ððð, ðð»ðð¶ð¹ ð¶ð ð¯ð¿ð²ð®ðžð: Eric says the biggest surprise after two years of these studies is "the extent to which people trust, even when they say they don't." A mismatched price or a wrong spec breaks that trust quickly.
ð§ðµð² ðžð²ðððŒð¿ð± ð·ð®ð¶ð¹ ð²ð¿ð®: Scot compares 20 years of chasing "men's running shoe" on Google with a world where shoppers let the AI choose for them.
ð°ð¬ ðœð²ðŒðœð¹ð², ðºðŒð»ððµð ðŒð³ ððŒð¿ðž: The study had 40 remote participants doing 30-minute think-aloud sessions on screen recordings. The team logged small behaviors down to seconds spent and scroll percentages.
Scot came out of the Amazon era believing the buy box was everything, and this study tells him ChatGPT has one too. Enjoy the conversation.
Timestamps: 01:57 Meet Eric Van Buskirk, Clickstream Solutions 02:15 Why ReFiBuy commissioned this study 02:48 Eric's background: SEMrush, Backlinko, Kevin Indig 04:05 Stated preference vs. observed behavior 06:05 How a behavioral study works 08:30 Why 40 people is enough 10:20 Who took part, and who got cut 11:55 The Amazon buy box and agentic commerce optimization 14:25 Finding #1: Pictures beat paragraphs 16:40 Card position: #1 wins, #3 beats #2 18:55 84% of choices come from a product card 20:35 Google SEO vs. AI: the "keyword jail" era 23:40 When do shoppers click out? 25:30 75% skip the text and go straight to the cards 27:25 Offer cards: the first offer dominates 30:20 Ads in ChatGPT: what shoppers really think 35:50 Trust and the reviews paradox 40:25 When bad data breaks trust 41:35 Where to get the study and work with Eric 44:55 Wrap-up
ð Connect with Eric: https://www.linkedin.com/in/vanbuskirk/ ð Learn more about Clickstream Solutions: https://clickstream.cc/
ð§ Want to stay ahead in AI commerce? Subscribe and follow along: ð° Subscribe to the free Substack: retailgentic.ai ðº Watch episodes on YouTube & Subscribe for updates: https://www.youtube.com/@Retailgentic
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den hÀr sidan tillhör
Scot Wingo | Retail Trends Analyst. Innehållet i podden Àr skapat av Scot Wingo | Retail Trends Analyst och inte av,
eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.