Every year we spring forward and lose an hour of sleep. But do we also lose a few heart cells? Some headlines claim that heart attacks spike by 24% after daylight saving time begins. In this episode we trace that number back to the research behind it—and what we find is more complicated than the headlines suggest. We examine a famous New England Journal of Medicine letter, a large international meta-analysis, and a massive modern U.S. registry study. Along the way we talk about incidence ratios, relative versus absolute risk, negative controls, and a haunting concept called harvesting. Plus: why bar charts are not for numerical data, why journalists love dramatic numbers, and how a bug collector helped invent daylight saving time.
Statistical topics
Incidence ratios / incidence rates
Meta-analysis
Negative controls
Relative risk vs absolute risk
Statistical vs practical significance
Statistical Sleuthing
Methodological morals
“A bump in time isn’t always a bump in total.”
“If you already know the story you want to tell, you can always find a number to tell it.”
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör
Regina Nuzzo and Kristin Sainani. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Regina Nuzzo and Kristin Sainani och inte av,
eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.