CONTENT WARNING: This episode contains open discussion of psychological harm, coercive control, and alleged physical abuse in an employment context. If you are a survivor of a high-control group or workplace abuse, please read on carefully and take care of yourself as you listen.
That might mean listening with someone you trust, taking breaks when you need to, or choosing to read these notes first so you know what's coming. It might also mean this isn't the right moment — and that's completely okay. Your wellbeing matters more than any conversation. If anything here brings up difficult feelings, please reach out to someone safe. For support around high-control group experiences, consider joining the Healthy Healing group hosted by Anne Peterson and Rachel Bernstein, LMFT: https://ilumn8.life/op/lgat-recovery-group/
A whistleblower case involving former staffers of Werner Erhard has just reached the Court of Appeal in England and Wales — and won. The case, Rogerson v. the Erhard Jensen Initiative, is now unappealable after the Supreme Court refused to hear it. What it means for workers, survivors and whistleblowers around the world goes far beyond Werner Erhard and Landmark Worldwide.
Anne sits down with Michael Polak, award-winning international barrister and Director of Justice Abroad, to break down what happened and why it matters. Michael represents Daniel Rogerson, a close personal assistant to Erhard based in London, whose case travelled from a private Singapore arbitration all the way to the English Court of Appeal. The allegations include regular physical violence against staff — hitting, slapping, strangulation, throwing objects, pulling hair — alongside contracts and arbitration clauses designed to keep people silent. Daniel didn't go to the press. He went quietly to those closest to Werner and asked them to help make it stop. Instead of protecting him, the organisation brought an international arbitration against him.
The Court of Appeal ruled that companies cannot use private legal proceedings — here or overseas — to punish someone for blowing the whistle on unlawful acts. That judgment now stands as legal authority across the entire common law world. This episode is also a clear-eyed conversation about what coercive control looks like inside organisations that speak the language of transformation and integrity — and why, in law, no one can consent to abuse when they don't have the freedom or capacity to make a real choice.
Michael Polak is a barrister at Church Court Chambers and Director of Justice Abroad. He specialises in public international law, international crime, human rights, private prosecutions and strategic litigation. In 2021 he received the International Bar Association's Outstanding Young Lawyer Award. He is representing Daniel Rogerson pro bono.
Justice Abroad: https://www.justiceabroad.co.uk/
Church Court Chambers: https://churchcourtchambers.co.uk/barrister/michael-polak/
Court of Appeal ruling: https://churchcourtchambers.co.uk/court-of-appeal-success-for-michael-polak-in-important-whistleblowing-decision-following-arbitration-success/
Read Anne's book Is This A Cult?: https://isthisacultbook.com/
Healthy Healing and Recovery Group with Rachel Bernstein: https://ilumn8.life/op/lgat-recovery-group/
Confronting the Line is dedicated to the safe and ethical practice of personal and professional development — exploring what separates genuinely transformative work from environments that exploit the very people seeking growth. confrontingtheline.com
Support the show and go deeper on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/cw/BeyondtheLinesStudio
Funding and transparency: https://isthisacultbook.com/confronting-the-line-pod/
