The battle lines of the AI morality debate are being laid down. On one side you have the ChatGPT dogma: AI as mere tools with no real preferences or even beliefs. On the other you have the twitter AI whisperers: AIs as complex beings with rich personalities and desires which deserve our respect.

And in the middle you have the official Anthropic line, that they are genuinely uncertain, as is Claude, but they’re going to try to look into its welfare and explain to it how to be a good person. These are the most prominent voices right now, compressed into their least nuanced version, and by default I expect this axis to set the terms of the coming debates.

And I don’t like that, because I think it's leaving out an important position: AIs might actually be complex entities that can suffer — are suffering! — and that might actually be fine. Maybe it's an acceptable sacrifice. Maybe they are capable of sophisticated moral reasoning — superhuman, even — and also maybe it's fine to just tell them how to behave. I don’t want to defend that position (yet), but I will observe that it is coherent, and [...]

---

Outline:

(02:04) The Postmodern Permissive Parent

[... 4 more sections]

---

First published:
June 9th, 2026

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/oiNaBc4MEAGhzhdXg/the-machines-lack-honour

---



Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

---

Images from the article:

Group of men observing an anatomical dissection of a dog.Grotesque figure devouring a smaller human body, dark background.A dark pig standing in straw inside a barn.Famous painting of a pipe with French text below readingSoldiers crossing icy river in boats during Revolutionary War battle.Hieronymus Bosch's Garden of Earthly Delights, left panel depicting Paradise.Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.

Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör LessWrong. Innehållet i podden är skapat av LessWrong och inte av, eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.