First, the plaintiffs bought a car from the defendant. They claim the defendant dismantled the check engine light to make it seem like it was usable. The car doesn’t work, so they’re suing for damages and their money back. The defendant argues they made a deal, and that’s that.
Then, the plaintiff went to dinner at the defendant’s restaurant, and her expensive jacket was stolen. She’s suing for the cost of the jacket. The defendant argues he has a coat rack in the restaurant and it’s not his fault if something gets taken.
Plus, the plaintiff hired the defendant to seal her windows with plywood because her house gets drafty in the winter. She learned the plaintiff was overcharging her, so she tried canceling the order. The plaintiff says the defendant wouldn’t give her the money back, so she’s suing. The defendant argues it’s not his fault she found someone else to do the work.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör
The People’s Court Podcast. Innehållet i podden är skapat av The People’s Court Podcast och inte av,
eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.