Having concerns about AI isn't a bad thing: it means you're thinking critically about an issue that warrants critical thought. But nor do concerns mean you have to (or should) avoid AI altogether.

The issues surrounding this world-changing technology are big, and I didn't want to gloss over them: What does "authenticity" mean in the AI era? What happens to your brain when you outsource thinking? What is the environmental cost of data centers? Are the companies building these tools considering anything beyond their bottom line?

So in this episode, I'm opening the whole can of worms, diving straight into the complex, nuanced, and evolving conversation. I'm using the AI triangle framework from last week's episode (episode 369) to work through each concern honestly, so if you haven't listened to that yet, start there.

Here's what we're getting into this week:

  •   The authenticity question: what it actually means to use AI and still have the work be yours
  •   Brain rot - is it real, and what the CEO/attorney/editor framework actually does to your thinking
  •   Ethics and tool choice: why not all AI companies are the same, and why that matters more than people realize    
  •   The environmental impact of AI, and what "intentional use" looks like in practice    

I'm also sharing the 5-Day Content Challenge we just launched - a free way to test the same AI content system that powers the Consistency Club, with almost no setup required.

Try the 5-Day Content Challenge: https://www.thiscantbethathard.com/5dcc

Resources:


Rss Apple Podcaster
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör Annemie Tonken. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Annemie Tonken och inte av, eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.