Meta's Muse is one of the best designed AI products of the year, and its little keychain, the Muse Charm, is coming by December. In this episode I look at what is inside the horse: hourly files on you and the people you mention, training switched on by default, a test with human callers, and an agent that couldn't explain what it had access to. Then I put Muse next to Meta's history of gifts first and terms later, from Onavo to the Ray-Ban glasses to our Instagram photos. I argue against myself, and I finish with three design decisions and three predictions on where consent goes once the screen disappears.


Key learnings

  • What Muse, Muse Spark and the Muse Charm actually are
  • What TIME found in Muse's instructions, and why the people around you are in it too
  • The gift first, terms later pattern across Meta's products
  • Three design decisions: defaults, visible memory, bystander consent
  • Where consent design is heading for us as designers



Resources


NEW 👉 AI Case Study Engine Waitlist: Sign up here

Build your Case study with AI


AI for Designers: 5-week Bootcamp 💻 next cohort in January

→ Sign up for the waiting list


💌 Newsletter

→ Free Weekly UX insights and updates: UX Newsletter


Follow the Future of UX:

🎨 Linkedin: Future of UX Podcast

📸 Instagram: Future of UX Podcast

🍏 Apple Podcast: Future of UX

💚 Spotify: Future of UX


Find Patricia on Socials

📸 Instagram @ux.patricia

🎨 Linkedin Patricia Reiners

🐦 Twitter @ux_Patricia

📝 My UX Design Blog

🎥 Youtube


Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör Patricia Reiners. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Patricia Reiners och inte av, eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.