Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan ruled against the use of the SAVE database.
The ruling cited:
Privacy concerns
Protection of voting rights
It argued that aggregating personal data across agencies (e.g., Social Security Administration, DHS) could violate legal protections.
2. SAVE System
A federal database used to verify immigration or citizenship status.
The commentary claims:
It was meant to prevent non-citizens from voting.
The judge blocked its expanded use because it allowed bulk data matching across agencies.
The judge is an activist judge
The ruling is:
Promoting “lawlessness”
Enabling voter fraud
Democrats and “the left” are:
Supporting weakened election safeguards
Opposing voter ID laws
4. SAVE Act Discussion
A proposed law requiring government-issued ID and proof of citizenship to vote.
It has broad public support (75–80%)
It is being blocked or slowed in the Senate
Republican figures like Mike Lee and Rick Scott, and President Donald Trump are big supporters.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör
iHeartPodcasts. Innehållet i podden är skapat av iHeartPodcasts och inte av,
eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.