Dela
How can assets be frozen under American sanctions and then potentially become the currency for a multibillion-dollar Russian oil deal?
Russia, Germany, and the United States are once again at the center of enormous oil and natural gas negotiations. From Vladimir Putin and former German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder to Angela Merkel, Donald Trump, Jared Kushner, Steve Witkoff, and Russian energy giants Gazprom, Rosneft, and Lukoil, the relationships behind these multibillion-dollar energy deals raise serious questions about political influence, private investors, sanctions, and who ultimately profits.
The Nord Stream pipelines beneath the Baltic Sea are back in the discussion as American and Russian interests reportedly explore possibilities for restoring Russian natural gas sales to Europe. Meanwhile, Lukoil's proposed $20–22 billion international asset sale has attracted American and Middle Eastern investors, including Todd Boehly and Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan. The Carlyle Group's withdrawal, proposed ownership arrangements involving the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation, and questions surrounding frozen Russian securities add another dimension to these negotiations.
But what about the environmental consequences? The September 2022 Nord Stream pipeline explosions released an estimated 465,000 metric tons of methane into the atmosphere, according to a 2025 scientific study. Researchers also examined the potential effects of the underwater explosions on Baltic Sea marine life, including harbour porpoises, seals, and fish. The risks extended beyond escaping gas to underwater shock waves and disturbed seabed sediments.
Even more troubling is the question of smaller underwater pipeline leaks. Nord Stream's own 2009 environmental assessment acknowledged that very small offshore gas leaks might escape detection. Its monitoring system was designed around detecting losses of approximately 1–2% of gas throughput. What happens when multiple smaller leaks develop along an underwater pipeline? Can monitoring systems identify them all, or could some continue unnoticed?
The environmental concerns are hardly new. On January 28, 1969, the Santa Barbara oil spill began off the California coast when a Union Oil drilling operation suffered a blowout. Approximately three million gallons of crude oil escaped into the Pacific Ocean, devastating beaches and threatening seabirds, seals, and other marine life. Oil and gas even escaped through fractures in the ocean floor. The disaster helped energize the American environmental movement and contributed to the first Earth Day in 1970.
Now, more than half a century later, the questions surrounding offshore drilling, underwater pipelines, leak detection, environmental protection, and corporate accountability remain. As governments and investors discuss billions in potential energy profits, what consideration is being given to ordinary taxpayers, consumers paying at the gas pump, dolphins, porpoises, and the marine ecosystems surrounding these projects?
Psychopath In Your Life follows the money, the political relationships, the historical scandals, and the people involved in these Russian, German, and American energy negotiations. The question isn't simply whether these deals can be made. It's who benefits, who bears the risks, and who is willing to take responsibility when something goes wrong.
Music: Aaron Tippin - You've Got To Stand For Something (Official Video) - YouTube
President Trump Warned About Relying On Russian Oil, While The German Delegation Laughed At Him
'PUTIN LOOTING AMERICA?': Rubio Accidentally EXPOSES Russia Oil Secret; Zelensky ALARMED | Watch
TransCanada and Keystone XL : The Money Pipeline - The Fifth Estate
Keystone Pipeline Spill Leaks 383,000 Gallons of Oil Into ND Wetlands
Major oil spill in Kansas is largest in Keystone pipeline's history
Keystone Was Not What You Think. It Was a Buried River of Oil!
No. 398: Harbour porpoises and the construction of Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline
Gerhard Schröder Casts a Dark Shadow over Berlin's Foreign Policy - DER SPIEGEL
How to Use Russia's Frozen Assets | Council on Foreign Relations
Implementing the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026 – The White House
Ex-German chancellor Gerhard Schröder under fire for meeting Putin | Germany | The Guardian
FOX 11 Archives: The 1969 Santa Barbara Oil Spill
How hormones work to flip sexes: Hormones
Do you have a psychopath in your life? The best way to find out is read my book. BOOK *FREE* Download – Psychopath In Your Life4
Support is Appreciated: Support the Show – Psychopath In Your Life
Download Pods here: TOP PODS – Psychopath In Your Life
My old discussion forum with last 10 years of victim stories, is back online. Psychopath Victim Support Community | Forums powered by UBB.threads™
Google Maps My HOME Address: 309 E. Klug Avenue, Norfolk, NE 68701 SMART Meters & Timelines – Psychopath In Your Life
THE PLAYERS: Russia, Germany, America and the New Energy Deals
Two major Russian energy transactions have entered discussions involving the United States, Russia, and international investors.
The first involves reopening the Nord Stream natural gas pipelines connecting Russia and Germany, potentially bringing American investors into the ownership structure.
The second involves the proposed sale of approximately $20 billion to $22 billion in international assets belonging to Lukoil, one of Russia's largest oil companies.
These are separate transactions, but they overlap through American and Russian negotiators, sanctions policy, and proposals for American investment.
Neither transaction has been completed.
THE RUSSIAN PLAYERS
Vladimir Putin — President of Russia
Putin is central to the negotiations over Ukraine and Russia's future economic relationship with the United States.
According to October 2026 reporting, Putin personally raised the proposed Lukoil sale during a September 5 meeting in Moscow with American representatives Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner.
Kirill Dmitriev — Russian presidential adviser and investment negotiator
Dmitriev is a major figure in the discussions about restoring Russian energy sales to Europe.
He has participated in talks with Jared Kushner and has met American Energy and Treasury Department representatives regarding possible energy cooperation.
Dmitriev is particularly important because his involvement connects Russian diplomatic negotiations with international investment proposals.
Gazprom — Russian state-controlled natural gas company
Gazprom owns 51% of Nord Stream AG, the company associated with the original Nord Stream pipeline.
The remaining ownership is divided among German, French, and Dutch interests.
Gazprom is the major Russian corporate player in discussions about restoring pipeline gas deliveries to Germany.
Lukoil — Russian oil and gas company
Lukoil is one of Russia's largest oil producers.
Unlike Gazprom, Lukoil has historically been privately controlled rather than directly state-controlled.
Its international holdings include oil and gas production interests, refineries, and retail fuel networks across multiple countries.
Following American sanctions imposed in October 2025, Lukoil began pursuing the sale of substantial overseas holdings.
THE AMERICAN PLAYERS
Donald Trump — President of the United States
The Trump administration controls important American decisions involving sanctions, investment approvals, and negotiations with Russia.
Any proposed transaction involving sanctioned Russian energy assets requires scrutiny under American sanctions rules.
Jared Kushner — American negotiator and private investor
Kushner, Trump's son-in-law, has participated in negotiations with Russia concerning Ukraine and potential economic agreements.
He has been involved in discussions with Kirill Dmitriev about energy cooperation.
Kushner also has private investment interests, including business relationships with investors reportedly involved in the proposed Lukoil acquisition.
These overlapping relationships have attracted scrutiny over potential conflicts of interest.
Steve Witkoff — American diplomatic envoy and real estate investor
Witkoff has participated alongside Kushner in negotiations with Russian officials.
The White House confirmed that Witkoff and Kushner worked with the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation on proposed financial terms connected to the Lukoil transaction.
Business connections between investors in the proposed acquisition and the Witkoff family have raised additional conflict-of-interest questions.
Todd Boehly — American billionaire investor
Boehly is associated with a competing consortium seeking to acquire Lukoil's international assets.
His business interests include financial investments and professional sports ownership.
The proposed consortium involves American and Middle Eastern investors and potentially an American government investment agency.
U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC)
The DFC is a federal government agency supporting international investment and development projects.
It has been identified as a potential participant in the Lukoil acquisition.
Published reports have described a possible government ownership stake of approximately 15%, although the final investment structure has not been established.
This raises a significant question: how would the United States manage a transaction in which its government both regulates the sale of sanctioned assets and potentially participates financially?
U.S. Treasury Department
The Treasury Department administers American financial sanctions through the Office of Foreign Assets Control.
It plays a central role because the proposed sale of Lukoil assets cannot simply proceed without the necessary sanctions authorizations.
THE MIDDLE EASTERN INVESTORS
Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan — United Arab Emirates
Sheikh Tahnoon is a senior member of Abu Dhabi's ruling family and a major figure in the country's investment sector.
He has been identified in reporting concerning Gulf financial backing for the proposed Lukoil acquisition.
Investment relationships involving Emirati interests and businesses associated with the Trump and Witkoff families have attracted scrutiny.
Moutaz and Ramez Al-Khayyat — Qatari business interests
The Al-Khayyat brothers are associated with substantial international construction and investment interests.
They have been identified among investors connected to the proposed Lukoil transaction.
They also have business connections involving a luxury resort development in Albania associated with Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump.
Their participation is important because it creates another documented business connection between potential buyers and people involved in American diplomatic negotiations. THE OTHER AMERICAN INVESTMENT FIRM
Carlyle Group — American private equity company
In January 2026, Carlyle reached a preliminary agreement to acquire much of Lukoil's international business.
That transaction remained subject to government approval.
On October 9, 2026, Carlyle announced that it was no longer actively pursuing the acquisition.
Its withdrawal changed the competitive situation surrounding the proposed sale.
THE GERMAN AND EUROPEAN PLAYERS
German federal government
Germany would have to approve any reopening of Nord Stream under the applicable regulatory framework.
As of October 2026, the German government opposes restarting the pipelines and maintains that Germany has developed alternative gas supplies.
German shareholders in Nord Stream
German corporate interests hold significant minority ownership positions in the original Nord Stream company.
According to Reuters, these shareholders want to preserve their stakes if Gazprom's ownership changes.
Alternative for Germany (AfD)
The German political party supports restoring Russian gas deliveries.
Reuters reported that Kirill Dmitriev was expected to meet AfD leadership in early 2027 to discuss renewed Russian gas sales.
Poland and other European governments
Poland and the Baltic states strongly oppose renewed Russian energy dependence.
Their opposition presents a major political obstacle to any agreement reopening Nord Stream.
WHERE THE NEGOTIATIONS STAND
As of October 18, 2026, there is no completed agreement reopening Nord Stream or transferring Lukoil's international portfolio to the proposed investor consortium.
The principal issues remain ownership, financing, sanctions approval, and the political conditions under which Russian energy might again reach European markets.
The central investigative questions are straightforward.
Who currently owns the assets? Who is negotiating their sale? Who would provide the money? Who would control the resulting companies? Who has the authority to approve the transactions? And who would ultimately receive the profits?
Those questions provide a starting point for following the ownership and financial relationships behind these energy negotiations.
MAJOR OIL SPILLS AROUND THE WORLD
A historical record of tanker disasters, offshore well blowouts, and pipeline failures
Oil spills have occurred across the world's oceans, rivers, coastlines, and inland waterways for decades. Some resulted from tanker collisions or groundings. Others came from offshore drilling accidents, ruptured pipelines, or failures in petroleum infrastructure.
This record separates the incidents by type so readers can see how oil escapes into the environment, whether during transportation, extraction, or storage.
It is a substantial historical list of major documented incidents, not an exhaustive record of every spill worldwide. Estimated quantities can differ between investigations, and oil released is not necessarily the same as oil that reached a shoreline.
Oil tanker spillsThese figures are reported in metric tonnes of oil released, using the International Tanker Owners Pollution Federation (ITOPF) historical records.
Year Tanker Location Oil spilled 1967 Torrey Canyon United Kingdom 119,000 tonnes 1972 Sea Star Gulf of Oman 115,000 1975 Jakob Maersk Portugal 88,000 1976 Urquiola Spain 100,000 1977 Hawaiian Patriot Pacific Ocean, Hawaii 95,000 1978 Amoco Cadiz France 223,000 1979 Atlantic Empress Tobago, Caribbean 287,000 1979 Independenta Turkey, Bosphorus 94,000 1980 Irenes Serenade Greece 100,000 1983 Castillo de Bellver South Africa 252,000 1985 Nova Persian Gulf, Iran 70,000 1988 Odyssey Atlantic Ocean, off Canada 132,000 1989 Exxon Valdez Alaska, USA 37,000 1989 Khark 5 Atlantic Ocean, off Morocco 70,000 1991 ABT Summer Atlantic Ocean, off Angola 260,000 1991 Haven Italy 144,000 1992 Aegean Sea Spain 74,000 1992 Katina P Mozambique 67,000 1993 Braer Scotland, Shetland Islands 85,000 1996 Sea Empress Wales, UK 72,000 2002 Prestige Spain 63,000 2007 Hebei Spirit South Korea 11,000 2018 Sanchi East China Sea 113,000
The Sanchi cargo was condensate, a light petroleum liquid, rather than conventional heavy crude. The amount released does not establish that its environmental effects were equivalent to those of other spills.
Offshore oil well blowoutsThese accidents involve loss of control over an oil well, sometimes allowing oil to escape for weeks or months.
Figures below are in barrels, rather than metric tonnes. Historical estimates vary.
Year Incident Location Estimated barrels released 1969 Santa Barbara Platform A California, USA 80,000–100,000 1970 Main Pass Block 41 Gulf of Mexico, USA 65,000 1971 Iran Marine International Persian Gulf, Iran 100,000 1977 Ekofisk Bravo North Sea, Norway 202,000 1979–80 Ixtoc I Gulf of Mexico, Mexico 3.0–3.5 million 1980 Funiwa 5 Nigeria 200,000 1980 Hasbah 6 Saudi Arabia, Persian Gulf 100,000–105,000 1986 Abkatun 91 Gulf of Mexico, Mexico 247,000 1987 Yum II / Zapoteca Gulf of Mexico, Mexico 58,643 2009 Montara Timor Sea, Australia 29,600–222,000 2010 Deepwater Horizon Gulf of Mexico, USA Approximately 4.9 million
The 2010 Deepwater Horizon disaster killed 11 workers and released approximately 134 million gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico, according to NOAA's current accounting.
Pipeline ruptures and leaksPipeline accidents deserve their own section because they can contaminate rivers, wetlands, farmland, and drinking-water sources. Unlike tanker accidents, some pipeline releases can continue before operators identify and isolate the failure.
Year Incident Location Type 1996 Reedy River spill South Carolina, USA Petroleum pipeline rupture 2010 Enbridge Line 6B, Kalamazoo River Michigan, USA Diluted bitumen pipeline rupture 2017 Keystone spill South Dakota, USA Crude oil pipeline leak 2019 Keystone spill North Dakota, USA Crude oil pipeline leak 2022 Keystone spill Kansas, USA Crude oil pipeline rupture 2025 Keystone spill North Dakota, USA Crude oil pipeline leak
For perspective, NOAA reports approximately 843,000 gallons released from the Enbridge pipeline in Michigan in 2010. The oil entered Talmadge Creek and affected roughly 38 miles of the Kalamazoo River.
The Keystone incidents are also worth highlighting because they occurred along the same pipeline system in different years. Reuters documented approximately 6,592 barrels in 2017, 4,515 in 2019, 14,000 in 2022, and 3,500 in April 2025.
Additional major pipeline and petroleum-transfer disastersThese incidents broaden the record beyond North America.
Year Incident Location Details 1994 Komineft pipeline spills Komi Republic, Russia UN investigators estimated approximately 95,000 tonnes released in the affected area, with additional oil escaping into the Kolva River 2008–09 Bodo pipeline spills Niger Delta, Nigeria Two major pipeline failures; the quantity released remains disputed 2022 La Pampilla refinery marine terminal Peru Approximately 11,900 barrels spilled during tanker unloading through marine transfer infrastructure
Sources: technical spill-response documentation, Shell's account of the Bodo incidents, UNEP, and NOAA's investigation of the Peru disaster.
Other significant oil releasesNot every major oil release belongs in one of the three categories above.
Year Incident Location Classification 1910–11 Lakeview Gusher California, USA Onshore well blowout 1988 Ashland Petroleum Pennsylvania, USA Storage tank failure 1991 Persian Gulf oil spill Kuwait / Persian Gulf Deliberate wartime oil release 1992 Fergana Valley spill Uzbekistan Onshore oil well blowout 2005 Hurricane Katrina oil releases Louisiana, USA Multiple storm-related infrastructure spills 2006 Citgo Lake Charles Louisiana, USA Refinery wastewater and oil release
These should remain separate from tanker and pipeline accident statistics.
Reference sourcesFor the website, these provide a strong foundation for checking individual incidents and expanding the historical record.
The incidents documented here span more than a century. Tankers have collided, drilling wells have blown out, pipelines have ruptured, and oil has entered oceans, rivers, wetlands, and coastlines around the world.
The question is not simply how much oil can be transported or how cheaply it can be delivered. It is also what happens when the equipment fails, how quickly the failure is detected, and who bears the environmental cost.
This historical compilation contains more than 40 documented incidents. It is a selected record, not a complete worldwide inventory, and spill estimates should not be added together without standardizing units and accounting methods.
For the Germany–Russia pipeline episode, the 1994 Komi pipeline disaster in Russia is particularly relevant. It puts a documented Russian pipeline failure directly alongside the discussion of new international petroleum infrastructure.
1. Aust, Stefan, Hans-Joachim Noack, and Gabor Steingart. "Dann lasst uns streiten!" Der Spiegel, April 18, 2003. https://www.spiegel.de/politik/dann-lasst-uns-streiten-a-1368cd0f-0002-0001-0000-000026895721.
2. Reuters. "Germany Pressed to Rethink Nord Stream 2 Pipeline after Navalny Poisoning." September 2020. https://www.investing.com/news/world-news/calls-mount-for-germany-to-rethink-nord-stream-2-after-navalny-poisoning-2284810.
3. Reuters. "Profile: Former German Chancellor Schroeder Joins Supervisory Board of Russian Retailer, RBC Reports." October 2026. https://www.reutersconnect.com/item/profile-former-german-chancellor-schroeder-joins-supervisory-board-of-russian-retailer-rbc-reports/dGFnOnJldXRlcnMuY29tLDIwMjY6bmV3c21sX1ZBNzAxMDAyMTAyMDI2UlAx.
4. Der Spiegel. "News: Russland, Ukraine, Gerhard Schröder, Emmanuel Macron, Axel Springer." 2022. https://www.spiegel.de/ausland/news-russland-ukraine-gerhard-schroeder-emmanuel-macron-axel-springer-a-281067f4-ba86-404a-af02-3d853a773dda.
5. The Guardian. "'Merkel Diamond' Takes Centre Stage in German Election Campaign." September 3, 2013. https://www.theguardian.com/world/german-elections-blog-2013/2013/sep/03/angela-merkel-diamond-german-election-campaign.
6. Agence France-Presse. "The Merkel Rhombus: How a Hand Gesture Became a Brand." The Straits Times, December 2021. https://www.straitstimes.com/world/europe/the-merkel-rhombus-how-a-hand-gesture-became-a-brand.
7. Knight, Ben. "The History of Nord Stream." Deutsche Welle, July 25, 2021. https://amp.dw.com/en/the-history-of-nord-stream/a-58618313.
8. "Manager und Märkte." Die Zeit, August 7, 1992. https://www.zeit.de/1992/33/manager-und-maerkte.
9. "Minol: Verkauft." Die Zeit, October 23, 1992. https://www.zeit.de/1992/44/verkauft.
10. Dettmer, Markus, Dietmar Hawranek, and Georg Mascolo. "Vermutlich bewaffnet." Der Spiegel, September 24, 2000. https://www.spiegel.de/politik/vermutlich-bewaffnet-a-31e3310b-0002-0001-0000-000017436544.
11. Gattegno, Hervé. "Les juges allemands, français et suisses progressent lentement dans l'enquête sur le scandale Elf-Leuna." Le Monde, January 25, 2000. https://www.lemonde.fr/archives/article/2000/01/25/les-juges-allemands-francais-et-suisses-progressent-lentement-dans-l-enquete-sur-le-scandale-elf-leuna_3587284_1819218.html.
12. "Les services secrets invités du volet allemand du procès Elf." Le Monde, April 29, 2003. https://www.lemonde.fr/archives/article/2003/04/29/les-services-secrets-invites-du-volet-allemand-du-proces-elf_318471_1819218.html.
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör
Dianne Emerson. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Dianne Emerson och inte av,
eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.
Avsnitt sparat!
Du hittar sparade avsnitt på Mina sidor.
Kunde inte spara avsnitt
Något gick fel. Försök igen.