"The Moors disappeared from power. Their faces did not. They remained on the shields of Europe."

Who were the Moors, were the Moors Black, and what happened to the Moors after 1492? This episode follows Moorish history, the Black Moors, Moors in Spain, Muslim Spain and al-Andalus from the Muslim conquest of Iberia through the Reconquista and Granada 1492. When Granada fell to Ferdinand and Isabella, nearly eight centuries of Muslim political rule in parts of Iberia came to an end. But the Moors did not simply disappear, and neither did their image from European history.

The Moor's head and Moor's head heraldry appear across medieval Europe. These Black heads in European heraldry can be found in Germany, Spain, Sardinia, Corsica, Italy, Switzerland, France and England. The trail includes the Black Saint Maurice, the Moor of Freising, the Coburg Moor head, the Sardinia Four Moors, the Corsica Moor head and Spain's Cross of Alcoraz. These images did not all have the same meaning. Some represented Saint Maurice, some were associated with Christian victories over Muslim rulers, and others became symbols of families, cities and territories.

The Black Saint Maurice is particularly important to the history of Black Africans in medieval Europe. Around 1240, Saint Maurice was portrayed at Magdeburg as a Black African Christian soldier. In Freising, a crowned Black or Moor's head was documented by 1316. Centuries later, the Freising Moor became part of the Joseph Ratzinger coat of arms when he became Archbishop of Munich and Freising in 1977. When Ratzinger became Pope Benedict XVI in 2005, the Pope Benedict XVI coat of arms still displayed the historic Pope Benedict XVI Moor head, alongside the Bear of Saint Corbinian.

The year 1492 connects the Moors to another enormous historical sequence: Ferdinand and Isabella, the Spanish Inquisition, the Alhambra Decree, the expulsion of practicing Jews from Spain and Christopher Columbus. Granada fell on January 2, 1492. The Alhambra Decree was issued on March 31. Columbus sailed west on August 3. Instead of separating these events into different chapters of history, this episode puts them back onto the same timeline.

The Moorish and North African story then enters the history of America. In 1528, Estevanico, a Moroccan-born North African, arrived in Florida and later traveled across areas of the present-day American Southwest. The history of Islam in early America also includes the Thomas Jefferson Quran. Jefferson purchased George Sale's English translation of the Quran in 1765. After the congressional library burned in 1814, Congress purchased Jefferson's 6,487-volume library for $23,950 in 1815. The Jefferson Koran, or Quran, became part of the Library of Congress.

The investigation eventually reaches the Statue of Liberty origin and Frédéric Auguste Bartholdi. Before creating the Statue of Liberty, Bartholdi traveled to Egypt and later proposed a colossal Statue of Liberty Egyptian woman precursor for the entrance to the Suez Canal. The project, commonly called Egypt Carrying the Light to Asia, depicted an Egyptian fellah, or peasant woman, carrying a light. The proposed Suez Canal Statue of Liberty was never built, but Bartholdi later developed the monumental female figure that became Liberty Enlightening the World.

Was the original Statue of Liberty connected to Bartholdi's Egyptian woman? Was the Statue of Liberty a Muslim woman in its earlier Egyptian conception? Was the Statue of Liberty a Black woman? The historical trail leads directly into nineteenth-century Egypt, where Black Muslims in Egypt, Sudanese and Nubian populations were present when Bartholdi traveled there in 1855–1856. Bartholdi drew Egyptian women, including Black Egyptian women, before developing his monumental Egyptian lighthouse proposal. Following that evidence takes the Statue of Liberty history backward through Egypt, the Suez Canal and Bartholdi's original vision of a gigantic woman carrying a light.

From the Moors, Black Moor's heads and Black Saint Maurice to Granada 1492, Ferdinand and Isabella, Thomas Jefferson's Quran, Bartholdi's Egypt and the Statue of Liberty, this episode follows the symbols and historical connections that survived while kingdoms, dynasties and governments disappeared. The political world changed. The names changed. The explanations changed. But the symbols remained.

Music:  Chicago - Does Anybody Really Know What Time It Is? (Official Audio)

Why Are Jesus and Lucifer Both Called Morning Stars?

"The Moors: The Black Empire That Built Modern Civilization (Hidden History)

Who Were the Moors? The Africans Who Ruled Spain for 700 Years  CLIP THE END

Was the Tower of Babel the Statue of Liberty of the Ancient World?

[PDF] [EPUB] Africans and Native Americans: The Language of Race and the Evolution of Red-Black Peoples Download

A Short History Of The Moors - PILOT GUIDES

Who Were The Moors? Origins, Culture, And Influence

The Moors & The European Renaissance

Moors/Nuwpunu in the Americas Before Columbus | NoopooH – African Culture based on Nature

Who were the Moors in Ancient times - America is the Old World

Statue of Liberty has 7 spikes on her crown: The Number 7 | Gnostic Warrior By Moe Bedard

Number symbolism - Numerology, Mysticism, Occultism | Britannica

The Moor's Head in European Heraldry: From War Trophy to Regional Flag

What is The Turkish Hat?

The Hidden Meaning Of The Statue Of Liberty's Illuminati Symbols | The Tonka Report

Is the Statue of Liberty Pagan?

How hormones work to flip sexes:  Hormones 

Do you have a psychopath in your life?  The best way to find out is read my book.  BOOK *FREE* Download – Psychopath In Your Life4

Support is Appreciated: Support the Show – Psychopath In Your Life

Download Pods here:   TOP PODS – Psychopath In Your Life

My old discussion forum with last 10 years of victim stories, is back online.  Psychopath Victim Support Community | Forums powered by UBB.threads™

Google Maps My HOME Address:  309 E. Klug Avenue, Norfolk, NE  68701   SMART Meters & Timelines – Psychopath In Your Life

The Statue of Liberty is a woman holding up a light.  Lucifer literally means "light-bearer" or "light-bringer."

Khazars — about 965–1000. Their state was smashed and fragmented. Contemporary and later evidence indicates survivors scattered, returned to former areas, or were absorbed into neighboring populations. Historians therefore talk about the disappearance of Khazaria as a political power, not the sudden disappearance of the Khazar people.

Moors — 1492. This one is particularly important for your argument. The fall of Granada ended the last Muslim-ruled state in Iberia, but it did not make the Muslim population disappear. Muslims remained; forced conversions followed, producing the population known as Moriscos, and large-scale expulsions came much later, especially 1609–1614. Historians explicitly caution that 1492 did not mark the immediate end of Islam or Muslims in Iberia.

Romanovs — 1917. Here the disappearance is much cleaner politically: Nicholas II abdicated and the Romanov monarchy ended. But the Romanov family itself did not disappear; other Romanovs survived outside Russia.

Habsburgs — 1918. Same basic distinction. The Habsburg imperial system collapsed at the end of World War I, but the Habsburg family continued.

So historians generally explain this phenomenon through state collapse, conquest, revolution, territorial fragmentation, assimilation, migration and dynastic replacement—not by saying an entire people mysteriously vanished.

And that's where I think you've found the useful thread:

Khazars: the STATE disappears.
Moors: their RULE disappears.
Romanovs: their DYNASTY loses the throne.
Habsburgs: their EMPIRE disappears.

THE NUMBER 33: JESUS CHRIST, FREEMASONRY, AND THE SCOTTISH RITE THE AGE OF JESUS CHRIST

Christian tradition holds that Jesus Christ was approximately 33 years old when he was crucified. The Bible does not explicitly state his age at death.

Luke 3:23 says Jesus was about 30 years old when he began his public ministry. The traditional calculation of a ministry lasting approximately three years produces an age of 33 at his crucifixion.

Historians generally date the crucifixion to approximately AD 30–33, although the exact year remains disputed.

The number 33 therefore became associated with the death, sacrifice, and resurrection of Jesus Christ in Christian tradition.

THE NUMBER 33 IN FREEMASONRY

The Scottish Rite of Freemasonry has 33 degrees. The first three are the foundational degrees of Craft Masonry: Entered Apprentice, Fellow Craft, and Master Mason.

The Scottish Rite continues with degrees 4 through 32. The 33rd degree is an honorary distinction generally awarded for exceptional service.

This system did not exist during the lifetime of Jesus. It developed in its present form approximately 1,800 years later.

The question is whether the founders deliberately selected 33 because of its association with the traditional age of Jesus Christ.

No surviving founding document conclusively establishes that explanation.

1761 — FRANCE AND THE EARLIER 25-DEGREE SYSTEM

In 1761, French Freemason Étienne Morin received authorization to propagate advanced Masonic degrees overseas.

Morin traveled through the Caribbean, particularly Saint-Domingue, now Haiti, and helped establish the network that transmitted the Rite of Perfection.

That earlier system contained 25 degrees, not 33.

The expansion from 25 to 33 degrees occurred during the subsequent development of what became the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite.

1786 — FREDERICK THE GREAT OF PRUSSIA

The Scottish Rite's Grand Constitutions are traditionally dated to 1786 and attributed to Frederick II, known as Frederick the Great, King of Prussia.

According to the traditional account, Frederick authorized the organization of the Rite into 33 degrees and established its governing structure.

However, historians have questioned the authenticity of this attribution. There is no conclusive contemporary evidence that Frederick personally established the system.

The date 1786 remains important to Scottish Rite institutional tradition, but the claims concerning Frederick must be distinguished from independently documented events.

1801 — CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA

On May 31, 1801, John Mitchell and Frederick Dalcho established the first Supreme Council of the 33rd degree in Charleston.

The new organization incorporated the earlier 25 degrees and added eight more, with the 33rd degree serving as the governing rank of Sovereign Grand Inspector General.

The council sought to establish centralized authority over previously independent groups conferring advanced Masonic degrees. Its motto was Ordo ab Chao — Order from Chaos.

The original Supreme Council eventually comprised eleven men. Nine were foreign-born and two were born in America. They included merchants, physicians, military officers, and men connected to European and Caribbean Masonic networks.

Four were Jewish, five Protestant, and two Roman Catholic, according to Scottish Rite historical accounts.

1802 — THE PUBLIC DECLARATION

On December 4, 1802, the Charleston Supreme Council issued its Circular throughout Two Hemispheres, announcing its authority and explaining the new organization.

The document attributed the creation of the 33rd degree to Frederick the Great in 1786.

This is significant because the earliest known surviving copy of the supposed 1786 constitutions dates from approximately 1801–1802 and appears in Frederick Dalcho's handwriting.

The organization therefore publicly claimed an older European royal authority that modern historians have been unable to verify.

1804 — THE SCOTTISH RITE RETURNS TO FRANCE

Alexandre François Auguste de Grasse-Tilly, one of the Charleston Supreme Council's members, established a Supreme Council in France in 1804.

The designation Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite appeared in an agreement with the Grand Orient of France that year.

Thus, a system with French and Caribbean antecedents was reorganized in Charleston and subsequently exported back to Europe.

1813 — THE 33RD DEGREE EXPANDS TO NEW YORK

On August 4, 1813, Emanuel de la Motta helped establish the Northern Masonic Jurisdiction's Supreme Council in New York City.

Its first Sovereign Grand Commander was Daniel D. Tompkins, who subsequently served as vice president of the United States under President James Monroe.

The 33-degree system was now represented by major governing bodies in both the northern and southern United States.

THE SYMBOLISM OF 33

The Scottish Rite uses biblical narratives, including the building of Solomon's Temple, alongside philosophical, moral, and historical allegories.

Its 18th degree is known as Knight Rose Croix, and its symbolism includes Christian themes, although interpretations vary across jurisdictions.

The number 33 also appears in Christian tradition through the commonly accepted age of Jesus at his crucifixion.

The association is striking, but similarity alone cannot establish that the Scottish Rite founders deliberately selected 33 for this reason.

The surviving early Scottish Rite documents emphasize authority, governance, and the organization of Masonic degrees rather than explicitly identifying Jesus' age as the explanation.

CONCLUSION

The documented history establishes that a 25-degree Masonic system circulated through France, the Caribbean, and North America before the establishment of the 33-degree Supreme Council in Charleston in 1801.

The founders claimed authority from constitutions attributed to Frederick the Great in 1786, but that royal connection remains historically disputed.

The traditional age of Jesus Christ at crucifixion was approximately 33. The Scottish Rite subsequently adopted a 33-degree structure, but its precise numerical rationale remains uncertain.

The central historical question is not whether both Christianity and Freemasonry use the number 33. They do. The question is whether the men who organized the Scottish Rite deliberately selected that number because of its Christian significance.

That connection has not been conclusively documented.

MOOR'S HEADS AFTER 1492

In 1492, the last Muslim kingdom in Spain fell when Granada surrendered to Ferdinand and Isabella. This ended Muslim political rule in the Iberian Peninsula after nearly eight centuries of changing Muslim states and territories beginning with the conquest of 711.

The Moor, however, did not disappear from European imagery.

Moor's heads had already appeared in European religious, civic and heraldic imagery before 1492. After the fall of Granada, those images continued to be used for centuries. They appeared on coats of arms, seals, flags, coins and ecclesiastical heraldry. Some survive today.

This does not mean that every Moor's head represented the same person, event or idea. The meaning depended upon the place and the particular heraldic tradition. In some cases the head represented Saint Maurice. In others it became a territorial or dynastic emblem. Some were associated with traditions of Christian victories over Muslim forces. In still other cases, the original explanation became uncertain while the emblem continued to be used.

CORSICA

One of the best-known surviving examples is the Moor's head of Corsica.

The Corsican emblem shows a Black head in profile wearing a white band around the forehead. Versions of the Moor's-head device existed before the modern Corsican state, but it became particularly important during the eighteenth-century Corsican independence movement.

In 1755, Pasquale Paoli established the Corsican Republic. The Moor's head became strongly identified with Corsican political and national identity.

This was more than 250 years after the fall of Granada.

The emblem survived subsequent French control of Corsica and remains the central image on the flag of Corsica today.

The important point is that by this period the Moor's head had acquired a heraldic and political existence independent of Muslim rule in Spain.

SARDINIA

Sardinia provides an even more dramatic example.

Its famous emblem consists of the Cross of Saint George accompanied by four Moor's heads. The design is commonly known as the Four Moors.

The symbol developed from medieval heraldic traditions associated with the Crown of Aragon. Later traditions connected the four heads with Christian victories over Muslim forces, although the precise origin and original meaning of the imagery have been debated.

After 1492 the emblem did not disappear. It continued through changing governments and dynasties and eventually became one of the principal symbols of Sardinia.

The Four Moors remain on the official Sardinian flag today.

FREISING

The Black head associated with Freising, Germany, is particularly important because its existence can be documented before 1492 and its survival can be followed into modern times.

A Freising document from 1316 describes the emblem with the Latin expression Caput Aethiopum, meaning essentially "head of an Ethiopian."

The precise origin of the Freising head remains uncertain.

Whatever its original meaning, the image became embedded in the heraldic tradition of the Diocese of Freising. The fall of Granada in 1492 did nothing to eliminate it.

It continued through the Reformation, the rise and fall of European dynasties, the creation of modern Germany and enormous changes within the Catholic Church.

More than six centuries after the 1316 reference, the same medieval heraldic tradition would become internationally visible again.

JOSEPH RATZINGER

In 1977, Joseph Ratzinger became Archbishop of Munich and Freising.

His episcopal coat of arms incorporated the traditional crowned Black head associated with Freising. Ratzinger did not create the Moor's head. He inherited it from the much older heraldic tradition of the diocese. His coat of arms also contained another old Freising symbol: the Bear of Saint Corbinian. The Black head and the bear therefore appeared together on Ratzinger's ecclesiastical arms.

When Ratzinger became Pope Benedict XVI in 2005, the Black head remained on his papal coat of arms. The Vatican identified the figure as the Moor of Freising and acknowledged that the origin of the ancient emblem was uncertain. A Black head documented at Freising in 1316 had therefore survived long enough to appear on the official coat of arms of a pope elected in 2005.

COBURG

Coburg, Germany, preserves another Black head with medieval origins. In this case the figure is associated with Saint Maurice. Saint Maurice was a Christian martyr traditionally connected with the Roman Theban Legion. During the Middle Ages he became an important saint within parts of the Holy Roman Empire.

One of the most striking medieval representations is the Black Saint Maurice at Magdeburg, dating from approximately 1240. Coburg's association with Saint Maurice is also medieval. The city's principal church, St. Moriz, is documented in the early fourteenth century, and the Black head of Saint Maurice subsequently became established as a civic emblem.

The image continued after 1492. It also survived the Protestant Reformation, despite its origins in medieval Christian saint imagery. The Black Saint Maurice head remains associated with Coburg today.

AFTER 1492

The fall of Granada fundamentally changed the political map of Western Europe, but it did not erase the Moor from European symbolism.

This is partly because heraldry works differently from ordinary political imagery. Once an emblem becomes attached to a family, city, bishopric, kingdom or territory, it can survive for hundreds of years. Later generations inherit the image even when the circumstances that originally produced it have disappeared. That happened with Moor's heads.

Some represented Saint Maurice. Some became regional emblems. Some were connected with Christian-Muslim warfare. Some became family heraldry. Some accumulated legends that were probably created long after the emblem itself appeared. In several cases historians cannot establish with certainty what the original image was intended to represent.

The terminology also changed. Medieval Europeans used words such as Moor, Aethiops and related terms differently from modern racial classifications. A Black head described as an Ethiopian in one medieval document might later be described as a Moor. Modern attempts to force every example into a single racial, religious or political category can therefore distort the historical record.

What can be documented is the persistence of the image.

Before 1492, Europeans lived alongside a powerful Muslim presence in the Mediterranean world. Muslim governments had controlled portions of Iberia since 711. Christian and Muslim states fought one another, traded with one another, negotiated treaties and exchanged people, goods and ideas.

Granada's surrender in 1492 ended the last Muslim state in Iberia, but it did not end European contact with Muslims or North Africa. Mediterranean warfare and commerce continued. The Ottoman Empire expanded. European states fought Muslim powers in North Africa and the Mediterranean for centuries afterward.

At the same time, the older heraldic Moor remained.

  • The Black Saint Maurice remained.
  • The Freising head remained.
  • The Corsican Moor remained.
  • The Four Moors of Sardinia remained.

And eventually one of those medieval Black heads traveled all the way from the heraldry of Freising to the coat of arms of Pope Benedict XVI in the twenty-first century.

The historical sequence is remarkable precisely because the political world surrounding the image changed so dramatically.

  • Muslim armies entered Iberia in 711.
  • Moor's and Black heads entered medieval European heraldry centuries later.
  • Granada fell in 1492.

European empires expanded around the world. The Reformation divided Western Christianity. Kings and dynasties disappeared. Modern European nations emerged. Yet the Moor's head remained visible.

The Moors ceased ruling Spain in 1492. Their heads remained in European heraldry for more than five hundred years afterward.

THE FEZ, THE TOP HAT, AND THE GILDED AGE

The fez became one of the most recognizable forms of headwear across the Ottoman Empire and North Africa during the 19th century.

Moors in North Africa, especially Morocco, wore the fez, particularly during the 18th, 19th, and early 20th centuries.

Medieval Moors in Spain generally did not wear the classic fez. During the medieval period, Moors wore a variety of turbans, wrapped head coverings and caps. The classic red, brimless fez became widespread much later.

During the 18th, 19th, and early 20th centuries, the fez or closely related forms of the brimless cap were worn by:

  • Ottoman Turks
  • Moroccans
  • Egyptians
  • Algerians
  • Tunisians
  • Syrians
  • Palestinians
  • Lebanese
  • Bosnian Muslims
  • Albanians
  • Macedonian Muslims
  • Ottoman Jews
  • Ottoman Christians
  • North African Moors

1829 — THE FEZ IS MANDATED

In 1829, Ottoman Sultan Mahmud II introduced major clothing reforms and made the fez part of official dress for government officials and military personnel.

The fez subsequently became closely associated with the Ottoman Empire and spread throughout Ottoman territories.

It was not exclusively Muslim clothing. Muslims, Christians and Jews living within the Ottoman world could all wear the fez.

1830s — THE TOP HAT BECOMES FASHIONABLE IN AMERICA

At roughly the same time that the fez was becoming established as official Ottoman headwear, the top hat was becoming fashionable in the United States.

By the 1830s, top hats were increasingly visible among American men.

1840s–1890s — THE TOP HAT BECOMES WIDESPREAD

During the middle and late 19th century, the top hat became particularly associated with businessmen, politicians, professionals and wealthy men.

It became one of the most recognizable symbols of formal male dress in the United States.

1870–1900 — THE GILDED AGE

The American Gilded Age, approximately 1870–1900, occurred during the period when both forms of headwear were prominent.

In the United States, the top hat was strongly associated with wealth, business, politics and social status.

Across the Ottoman Empire and parts of North Africa, the fez was widely worn.

EARLY 1900s — THE TOP HAT BEGINS TO DECLINE

During the early 20th century, the top hat began disappearing from ordinary daily American dress.

It continued to be worn for formal occasions, but other styles of men's hats increasingly replaced it for everyday use.

1925 — THE FEZ IS BANNED IN TURKEY

In 1925, under Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, the Turkish Republic passed the Hat Law as part of its program of clothing and social reforms.

The fez was replaced in official Turkish public dress by Western-style hats.

The period from the Ottoman dress reform of 1829 to the Turkish Hat Law of 1925 covered approximately 96 years.

1920s–1930s — THE TOP HAT BECOMES FORMAL WEAR

By the 1920s and 1930s, the American top hat had also largely disappeared from ordinary everyday clothing.

It survived primarily as formal evening and ceremonial wear.

TIMELINE

1829 — Fez mandated as part of Ottoman official dress reforms

1830s — Top hats become fashionable in the United States

1840s–1890s — Top hats widely popular in the United States

1870–1900 — American Gilded Age

1870–1900 — Top hat at its height as a symbol of wealth and status in the United States

1870–1900 — Fez widely worn across the Ottoman world and parts of North Africa

Early 1900s — Top hats begin declining as everyday American headwear

1925 — Fez banned in Turkey under the Hat Law

1920s–1930s — Top hats largely restricted to formal occasions

In 1828, Mahmud II had just completed his most audacious gamble. In June 1826, he forcibly suppressed and completely disbanded the Janissary corps — the military unit that had tyrannized the empire for centuries and blocked every reform effort. This event, in which more than 6,000 soldiers were executed, is called the Auspicious Incident (Vaka-i Hayriye). 

With the enormous obstacle of the Janissaries removed, the gates of reform swung open. In the dress reform of 1828-1829 that followed, Mahmud II designated the fez as the official headwear for officials and soldiers. The turban, which had divided people by rank, was discarded, replaced by the same red hat for everyone 

THE MOOR'S HEAD IN EUROPEAN HERALDRY

The Moor's head is one of the most striking images in European heraldry. A dark-skinned male head shown in profile appears on medieval coats of arms, royal emblems and, eventually, the modern flags of Sardinia and Corsica.

Its history stretches back more than 900 years and is closely connected with the medieval struggle between Christian and Muslim powers in the Mediterranean.

1096 — THE BATTLE OF ALCORAZ

In 1096, King Peter I of Aragon and Navarre fought Muslim forces outside the city of Huesca in northeastern Spain.

Huesca was controlled by the Muslim Taifa of Zaragoza and was an important stronghold during the Christian campaigns that became known as the Reconquista.

Peter I's forces defeated the Muslim army and captured Huesca.

A later medieval legend added another element to the story.

According to 14th-century chronicles, Saint George, the warrior saint, appeared during the Battle of Alcoraz riding a white horse and carrying a red cross. He was said to have helped the Christian army defeat the Muslim forces.

The legend claimed that four Moorish kings or princes were killed and that their severed heads were discovered following the battle.

Those four heads eventually became associated with one of the most recognizable heraldic emblems of medieval Aragon.

1281 — THE CROSS OF ALCORAZ

The emblem became known as the Cross of Alcoraz.

It shows a red Cross of Saint George on a white background with a Moor's head in each of the four quarters.

The earliest documentary evidence cited for this particular heraldic design dates to 1281, during the reign of Peter III of Aragon.

A lead-sealed decree from his chancery shows the Cross of Alcoraz and connects the emblem with Peter I and the legendary victory of 1096.

The Moor's head became associated with Christian military victories over Muslim forces. The image represented the defeated enemy and commemorated victories of the Reconquista.

By the 14th century, Moor's heads could be found on the coats of arms of noble families and other heraldic devices throughout parts of Iberia.

THE SEVERED HEAD AS A MILITARY SYMBOL

The image was not originally simply a portrait of a Moor.

It was depicted as a severed head.

In medieval warfare, severed heads could serve as trophies demonstrating the defeat of an enemy. In the context of the Reconquista, the Moor's head therefore carried a religious as well as military meaning.

It represented victory over a Muslim opponent and the triumph of Christian forces.

The heraldic image allowed that victory to become permanent. Instead of disappearing when the battle ended, the defeated enemy remained on shields, seals, banners and coats of arms.

The symbol could then be inherited by later generations.

SARDINIA — THE FOUR MOORS

The four Moor's heads eventually became one of the best-known symbols of Sardinia.

Sardinia entered the political world of the Crown of Aragon during the early 14th century. With Aragonese rule came Aragonese heraldic traditions, including the Cross of Saint George and the four Moor's heads.

The Sardinian emblem became known as I Quattro Mori — The Four Moors.

Several traditions developed explaining the identity of the four heads.

One associates them with the four Moorish rulers supposedly defeated at the Battle of Alcoraz.

Another associates them with four major Aragonese victories during the Reconquista.

Another connects them with Sardinian resistance against Muslim raiders.

Whatever interpretation was eventually attached to them, the Sardinian Four Moors came from the broader Aragonese heraldic tradition.

THE BLINDFOLDED MOORS

The appearance of the Sardinian heads changed over the centuries.

Early representations showed the figures with turbans or other head coverings.

During later Spanish rule, the white bands were increasingly depicted across the eyes, making the figures appear blindfolded.

The blindfold reinforced the image of captivity and defeat.

That remained part of the official Sardinian design well into the modern period.

In 1952, the Italian Republic officially adopted the Four Moors as the arms of Sardinia, with the bands still covering the eyes.

Then came a major change.

In 1999, the Sardinian Regional Council officially moved the bands from the eyes to the foreheads.

The Moor's eyes were open again.

CORSICA — ONE MOOR'S HEAD

Across the Mediterranean, Corsica developed another famous version of the symbol.

Instead of four heads, Corsica uses one Moor's head.

The modern Corsican flag shows a Black head in profile wearing a white band around the forehead.

A major change occurred in 1755, when Pasquale Paoli established the Corsican Republic.

The band that had previously been shown across the Moor's eyes was raised to the forehead.

The Moor was no longer presented as a blindfolded captive.

His eyes were open.

The image became associated with Corsican independence, freedom and national identity.

THE SYMBOL CHANGES

The transformation is remarkable.

The Moor's head began in the medieval Mediterranean world as an image connected with warfare between Christian and Muslim powers.

In the Aragonese tradition, the four heads became associated with the legendary victory at Alcoraz and the Christian Reconquista.

Over centuries the meaning changed.

On Sardinia, the Four Moors became a symbol of Sardinian identity.

On Corsica, the Moor's head became a symbol of Corsican identity and political liberty.

The defeated enemy became the emblem of the people displaying him.

Today the Moor's heads remain prominently displayed even though most people seeing the flags would never connect them with the medieval wars that produced the imagery.

THE TIMELINE

1096 — Battle of Alcoraz

Peter I of Aragon defeats Muslim forces outside Huesca.

14th-century chronicles

The legend develops that Saint George intervened at Alcoraz and that four Moorish rulers were killed.

1281 — Cross of Alcoraz

Documentary evidence shows the Cross of Saint George surrounded by four Moor's heads.

13th–14th centuries

Moor's-head imagery becomes established in Iberian heraldry.

1324 — Sardinia

Aragonese control brings Sardinia into the political and heraldic world of the Crown of Aragon.

14th–15th centuries

Early Sardinian representations show Moor's heads with turbans or headbands.

16th–18th centuries

The bands increasingly appear across the eyes, producing the familiar blindfolded Moors.

1755 — Corsica

Pasquale Paoli establishes the Corsican Republic. The Moor's band is raised from the eyes to the forehead.

1952 — Sardinia

The Italian Republic adopts the Four Moors as Sardinia's official arms. The figures remain blindfolded.

1999 — Sardinia

The bands are officially moved above the eyes onto the forehead.

More than 900 years after the Battle of Alcoraz, the Moor's head remains visible on European flags.

The battle became a legend.

The legend became heraldry.

And the heraldry survived long after the medieval world that created it disappeared.

THE MOORS

The word Moor was used for centuries in Europe, but it did not describe one single race, nationality or ethnic group.

The term became especially associated with the peoples of North Africa and Muslim-ruled Spain and Portugal, known as al-Andalus. These populations included Amazigh or Berber North Africans, Arabs, Iberian Muslims and Africans from farther south.

European terminology was not always precise. Words such as Moor, Ethiopian, African, Blackamoor and Saracen were sometimes used to describe dark-skinned people. This is important when looking at medieval European artwork and heraldry because figures now described as Black Africans were sometimes identified historically as Moors or Ethiopians.

711 — THE MOORS ENTER IBERIA

In 711, Muslim forces crossed from North Africa into the Iberian Peninsula.

Over the following centuries, large areas of Spain and Portugal came under Muslim rule.

The Muslim territories became known as al-Andalus.

Muslims, Christians and Jews lived within this world for centuries. Arabic became an important language of government, scholarship, medicine, mathematics, philosophy and commerce.

MOORS AND JEWS

Jewish communities had a substantial presence in medieval Iberia and North Africa.

Under Muslim rule, many Jewish scholars participated in the Arabic-speaking intellectual and commercial world. Some Jewish scholars wrote their works in Arabic or Judeo-Arabic.

Arabic and Hebrew are related languages. Both belong to the Semitic language family.

Hebrew ben means "son."

Arabic ibn means "son."

The communities were distinct, but their histories became deeply intertwined across North Africa and Iberia.

c. 1240 — BLACK SAINT MAURICE

Around 1240, Saint Maurice was portrayed at Magdeburg as a Black African Christian soldier.

Maurice was traditionally described as the commander of the Roman Theban Legion.

His medieval representation as a Black African became one of the most important Black images in European Christian art.

1316 — THE MOOR'S HEAD OF FREISING

By 1316, a crowned Black or Moor's head was documented in connection with Freising, Bavaria.

The symbol survived for centuries.

Joseph Ratzinger incorporated the historic Freising Moor's head into his coat of arms when he became Archbishop of Munich and Freising in 1977.

When Ratzinger became Pope Benedict XVI in 2005, the crowned Black head remained on his papal coat of arms.

1323 — COBURG AND SAINT MAURICE

By 1323, Saint Maurice was documented in connection with Coburg.

During the fourteenth century, Coburg developed heraldic imagery depicting the head of a Black Saint Maurice.

The Freising and Coburg heads therefore appeared in German heraldry long before the voyages of Columbus.

MOOR'S HEADS ACROSS EUROPE

Black or Moor's heads appeared for centuries on European coats of arms, flags, seals and other heraldic devices. They can be found in heraldic traditions associated with Germany, Corsica, Sardinia, Aragon, Italy, Switzerland, France and England.

These heads did not necessarily represent the same person or carry the same meaning. Some represented Saint Maurice, the Christian martyr who came to be depicted as a Black African in medieval European art. Some were explicitly identified as Moors. Others were associated with conflicts between Christian and Muslim forces or became symbols of particular cities, territories and families.

By the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, images identified as Moors, Ethiopians or Black Africans were firmly established within European heraldry.

1492 — GRANADA

On January 2, 1492, Granada surrendered to Ferdinand II of Aragon and Isabella I of Castile. Granada was the last Muslim-ruled kingdom on the Iberian Peninsula, and its surrender brought the long process of Christian territorial conquest known as the Reconquista to an end.

The political map of Iberia had changed dramatically.

1492 — THE ALHAMBRA DECREE

Less than three months later, on March 31, 1492, Ferdinand and Isabella issued the Alhambra Decree.

Practicing Jews in their kingdoms were ordered to accept Christianity or leave. Families preparing for exile had to dispose of homes, businesses and other property, often under severe time pressure.

The fall of Muslim Granada and the expulsion order against practicing Jews therefore occurred within the same extraordinary year.

1492 — COLUMBUS

Then, on August 3, 1492, Christopher Columbus sailed from Spain.

The sequence was remarkably compressed:

January 2 — Granada falls.
March 31 — Alhambra Decree.
August 3 — Columbus sails.

Columbus sought a western route to Asia and access to gold, valuable commodities and new commercial opportunities. Religion was also important to him. Later in his life, he compiled his Book of Prophecies, in which he connected his voyages and the wealth he hoped they would produce with Christian ambitions concerning Jerusalem.

1502 — MUSLIMS IN CASTILE

The surrender of Granada did not immediately remove Spain's Muslim population.

In 1502, Muslims in the Crown of Castile were required to convert to Christianity or leave. Muslims who converted to Christianity, and their descendants, eventually became known as Moriscos. Similar compulsory-conversion measures were later extended elsewhere in Spain.

The Muslim presence in Spain therefore did not simply disappear in 1492. The process continued for generations.

1528 — ESTEVANICO ARRIVES IN NORTH AMERICA

In 1528, a Moroccan-born African known as Estevanico, or Esteban de Dorantes, arrived in Florida with the Narváez expedition.

Estevanico had been enslaved and brought into the Spanish world. After the expedition ended disastrously, he became one of only four survivors who eventually reached Spanish settlements in Mexico.

His survival placed a Moroccan-born North African directly inside the earliest history of European exploration of what became the United States. 1539 — ESTEVANICO IN THE AMERICAN SOUTHWEST

In 1539, Estevanico traveled north into what is now Arizona and New Mexico as part of an expedition searching for wealthy civilizations to the north.

Less than fifty years after the fall of Granada, a Moroccan-born North African was traveling through the

The sequence was:

1765 — Jefferson buys the Quran.

1814 — The Capitol and congressional library burn.

1815 — Congress purchases Jefferson's library.

1815 — Jefferson's Quran enters the Library of Congress.

2007 — JEFFERSON'S QURAN RETURNS TO PUBLIC ATTENTION

In 2007, newly elected Congressman Keith Ellison, the first Muslim elected to the United States Congress, used Jefferson's Quran during his private ceremonial swearing-in.

The book was brought from the Library of Congress specifically for the ceremony.

A Quran purchased by Thomas Jefferson in 1765, transferred to Congress after the destruction of its library in 1814, was therefore still being used symbolically in Washington more than two centuries later.

BLACK MUSLIMS IN EGYPT

Black Muslims were present in Egypt long before Frédéric Auguste Bartholdi traveled there in the 1850s. Egypt's connections with Nubia and Sudan stretched back centuries, and by the nineteenth century Black African Muslims were a visible part of Egyptian society.

639–642 — ISLAM COMES TO EGYPT

Muslim armies entered Egypt in 639, and Alexandria fell by 642. Over the following centuries, Egypt became predominantly Muslim.

South of Egypt lay Nubia and, farther south, Sudan. These regions contained Black African populations that had maintained political, commercial and cultural connections with Egypt since ancient times. Islam gradually spread southward into Nubia and Sudan.

By the nineteenth century, Black African Muslim populations had therefore existed immediately south of Egypt for generations.

1820 — EGYPT INVADES SUDAN

In 1820, Muhammad Ali's Egyptian government invaded Sudan. Egyptian control eventually extended far south along the Nile, dramatically increasing movement between Sudan and Egypt.

Sudanese people entered Egypt as soldiers, servants, laborers and migrants. Thousands of others were forcibly transported north through the slave trade.

1820–1845 — BLACK AFRICANS ARE BROUGHT INTO EGYPT

During this period, Egyptian forces conducted slave raids in Sudan. Black Africans were transported north from areas including Darfur, Kordofan and Sennar.

Historical estimates suggested that as many as 10,000 enslaved Africans annually were being imported during parts of this period, although modern examination of Egyptian census records indicates that some contemporary estimates were probably too high.

Government slave-raiding expeditions were curtailed around 1845, but private trafficking continued.

By the middle of the nineteenth century, Black Africans were consequently present throughout Egyptian society.

1848 — THE EGYPTIAN CENSUS

Egypt's 1848 census provides unusually direct evidence of this population.

Approximately 55,072 enslaved people were recorded in Egypt. About 94 percent were classified as Black, using classifications including aswad and sudani. Many came from areas of Sudan including Darfur, Kordofan and Sennar.

The date matters because this census was conducted only a few years before Bartholdi traveled through Egypt.

Black Africans were not merely part of Egypt's distant history. They were living in the Egypt Bartholdi visited.

BLACK AND MUSLIM

Black Africans in nineteenth-century Egypt could also be Muslim.

Islam had already spread through significant portions of Nubia and Sudan, while Egypt itself was overwhelmingly Muslim. An enslaved African who became Muslim was not automatically freed, meaning a person could simultaneously be Black, Muslim and enslaved.

There were also free Sudanese and Nubian people living in Egypt.

It is therefore important not to treat Black, Sudanese, Nubian, Muslim and enslaved as interchangeable categories. They overlapped, but they did not mean the same thing.

1855–1856 — BARTHOLDI TRAVELS THROUGH EGYPT

Frédéric Auguste Bartholdi traveled through Egypt in 1855–1856.

He was fascinated by Egypt's enormous ancient monuments. The colossal sculptures he encountered helped inspire his ambition to create monumental figures of his own.

Bartholdi also produced drawings and photographs of people and places during his Egyptian travels.

The timing is significant. Only several years earlier, the 1848 Egyptian census had recorded more than 55,000 enslaved people, the overwhelming majority classified as Black.

Bartholdi was therefore traveling through an Egypt in which Black African men and women were visibly present.

BLACK EGYPTIAN WOMEN AND BARTHOLDI'S WORK

There is another connection involving Bartholdi's surviving visual material.

The National Park Service investigated claims that the Statue of Liberty had originally been conceived as a Black woman. Its research examined Bartholdi's Egyptian travels, his drawings and photographs, and the later development of his proposed Suez monument.

The evidence does not establish that the Statue of Liberty was specifically modeled on a Black Muslim woman. However, the National Park Service concluded that the available evidence does not permit Bartholdi's studies of Black Egyptian women to be categorically excluded from the visual background that preceded his Egyptian monument.

That distinction is important.

There is documented evidence that Bartholdi encountered and depicted Black women during his Egyptian travels. What cannot presently be established is that one particular Black woman served as the model for the later Statue of Liberty.

LATE 1860s — EGYPT CARRYING THE LIGHT TO ASIA

Bartholdi subsequently developed plans for an enormous monument at the entrance to the Suez Canal.

The proposed figure was an Egyptian fellah — a female Egyptian peasant.

The project became known as:

EGYPT, OR PROGRESS, CARRYING THE LIGHT TO ASIA

The enormous female figure would stand at the entrance to the Suez Canal carrying a light.

Egyptian ruler Khedive Isma'il Pasha ultimately rejected the proposal.

1868 — EGYPT'S ENSLAVED POPULATION

Egyptian census research indicates a dramatic increase in the recorded enslaved population between the middle of the century and the late 1860s.

1848 — approximately 55,072 enslaved people

1868 — approximately 173,654 enslaved people

The recorded population had approximately tripled in twenty years.

This period overlapped with Egypt's enormous cotton boom. When the American Civil War disrupted American cotton exports, European demand for Egyptian cotton soared. The Egyptian economy expanded rapidly, as did demand for agricultural labor.

Black Sudanese Africans constituted a major part of Egypt's enslaved population during this period.

1869 — THE SUEZ CANAL OPENS

The Suez Canal opened in 1869, but Bartholdi's colossal Egyptian woman was never constructed. A conventional lighthouse was instead erected at Port Said.

Nevertheless, Bartholdi's Suez project had already produced a striking concept: an enormous female figure representing Egypt, positioned at the entrance to a major waterway and carrying a light.

Several years later, Bartholdi began developing another monumental female figure carrying a light.

That figure became Liberty Enlightening the World — the Statue of Liberty.

BARTHOLDI'S EGYPTIAN WOMAN

The documented chronology is striking.

Bartholdi traveled through Egypt in 1855–1856, where Black Sudanese, Nubian and other African populations were living at the time. Some were enslaved, some were free, and many were Muslim.

Bartholdi produced visual studies during those travels.

In the late 1860s, he designed a colossal Egyptian peasant woman to stand at the entrance to the Suez Canal. She would represent Egypt and carry a light.

The monument was never built.

During the 1870s and 1880s, Bartholdi developed another colossal woman carrying a light, this time for the entrance to New York Harbor.

On October 28, 1886, that monument was dedicated as Liberty Enlightening the World — the Statue of Liberty.

The evidence does not prove that the Statue of Liberty was literally modeled on one identifiable Black Muslim woman.

But the Egyptian connection is real.

The Black African presence in the Egypt Bartholdi visited is real.

His proposed colossal Egyptian woman carrying a light is real.

And that Egyptian project came before the Statue of Liberty.

THE MOOR'S HEAD ON EUROPEAN SHIELDS

The Black or Moor's head that appears on the medieval shields of Freising and Coburg was not an isolated symbol.

Once we look beyond those two German examples, the same basic image appears across European heraldry: Germany, Italy, Corsica, Sardinia, Spain, Switzerland, France and elsewhere.

But there is an important distinction.

These heads did not all mean the same thing.

Some represented Saint Maurice. Some became associated with victories over Muslim rulers. Some belonged to noble families. Some became territorial emblems. In other cases, historians still do not know exactly why the head was originally chosen.

What matters is that by the later Middle Ages, the image of a dark-skinned or "Moorish" head was an established European heraldic device.

ABOUT 1240 — THE BLACK SAINT MAURICE AT MAGDEBURG

One of the most important surviving medieval representations of a Black African in Europe is the statue of Saint Maurice at Magdeburg Cathedral, generally dated to about 1240–1250.

Maurice was traditionally described as the commander of the Theban Legion, a Roman military unit whose members became Christian martyrs.

Medieval German artists eventually represented Maurice as a Black African.

This is important because it establishes something that can easily become confused in later heraldry:

A Black head on a medieval German shield does not automatically mean a defeated Muslim Moor.

It can represent a revered Christian saint.

1316 — FREISING

The Prince-Bishopric of Freising used a crowned Black head in its heraldry.

The figure was historically called the Freisinger Mohr, or Moor of Freising.

An early heraldic representation is documented in 1316.

This is the same heraldic tradition that eventually appeared on the coat of arms of Joseph Ratzinger, first as Archbishop of Munich and Freising and later, in modified form, on his papal arms as Pope Benedict XVI.

That makes the head on Benedict's shield much older than Benedict.

He inherited an established symbol of Freising.

And this gives us the combination that originally caught our attention:

a Black/Moor's head and the Bear of Saint Corbinian appearing together in the heraldry associated with Freising.

1323 — COBURG AND SAINT MAURICE

Coburg provides another German example, but with a different explanation.

Saint Maurice was connected with Coburg by the early fourteenth century.

The city's traditional arms eventually displayed the head of Saint Maurice, represented as a Black man.

So although the Freising and Coburg heads can look remarkably similar to modern eyes, we should not simply declare that they originated as the same symbol.

Coburg has a documented Saint Maurice tradition.

That distinction is important.

FOURTEENTH CENTURY — CORSICA

Then the symbol appears on an entirely different scale.

The traditional emblem of Corsica is a Black or Moor's head.

It is known as the Testa Mora, literally the Moor's Head.

The head is shown in profile with a white band around the forehead.

The emblem has medieval roots, although stories explaining exactly how Corsica acquired it developed later and are not all historically reliable.

The important point for our timeline is simpler:

By the fourteenth century, the Moor's head was established enough to function as the emblem of an entire territory.

FOURTEENTH CENTURY — SARDINIA AND THE FOUR MOORS

Sardinia gives us an even more striking example.

Its famous emblem contains a red Cross of Saint George dividing the shield into four sections.

Inside those sections are four Moor's heads.

This is commonly known as the Four Moors, or Quattro Mori.

Versions of this heraldic design appear in medieval armorials, including the late-fourteenth-century Gelre Armorial.

The Four Moors became one of the most recognizable heraldic symbols associated with Sardinia.

But the story leads back toward Spain.

ARAGON — THE CROSS OF ALCORAZ

The Spanish-Aragonese tradition contains another shield displaying four Moor's heads.

It is called the Cross of Alcoraz.

The design consists of the Cross of Saint George accompanied by four Moor's heads.

Later tradition connected the symbol with the Battle of Alcoraz, fought around 1096 during the Christian conquest of Huesca.

According to the legend, Saint George miraculously assisted the Christian forces and four Muslim rulers were defeated.

We need to separate that legend from the documentary history.

The heraldic representation itself appears considerably later than the supposed battle.

Nevertheless, by the medieval period the four Moor's heads had become explicitly connected with the Christian-Muslim conflict in Iberian heraldic tradition.

That makes this example fundamentally different from Coburg's Saint Maurice. Here the Moor's head really does become associated with warfare against Muslim powers. ITALIAN NOBLE FAMILIES

Moor's heads also appeared in Italian family heraldry.

One important example is the Pucci family of Florence.

Their arms contain Moor's heads.

This demonstrates that the image was not restricted to kingdoms, bishops or cities.

It entered the visual vocabulary of European noble families as well.

There are other Italian examples, and the motif appears particularly frequently in areas influenced by Mediterranean contact among Christian Europe, North Africa and the Islamic world.

THE TUCHER FAMILY OF NUREMBERG

Germany supplies another striking family example.

The powerful Tucher family of Nuremberg, prominent merchants and patricians, incorporated a Moor's head into their heraldic imagery.

That is significant because Nuremberg was a major commercial center of the Holy Roman Empire.

The appearance of the image in merchant-family heraldry reinforces the point that the Moor's head had become a recognizable heraldic device extending beyond explicitly religious imagery.

SWITZERLAND

The motif also appears in Swiss heraldry.

Examples have been associated with places including Avenches, Cornol and Flumenthal.

Again, these examples should be researched individually rather than assuming that every Black head carries one universal meaning.

That is especially important for our project because Switzerland puts the motif geographically close to the other imagery we have already been following through Bern and the surrounding regions.

FRANCE

French heraldry contains numerous examples of what heraldic descriptions call a tête de Maure, literally a Moor's head.

Different French families employed one, two or three Moor's heads in their arms.

Once again, this shows that we are dealing with an established heraldic category rather than a strange image appearing independently in Freising and Coburg.

ENGLAND

Moor's heads also reached British heraldry.

Several English families incorporated Moor's heads into their coats of arms or crests.

In some cases the explanation may be relatively mundane.

Heraldry frequently used visual puns known as canting arms.

A family named More, Moore or a similar name could therefore employ the image of a Moor.

That gives us another warning against assigning one meaning to every example.

A Moor's head might represent a saint in one place, warfare in another, a geographical identity somewhere else and a play on a person's surname somewhere else.

1492

For centuries before 1492, European Christians and Muslims had lived, traded and fought across the Mediterranean world.

The Moor was therefore not some obscure figure to medieval Europeans.

The Moor was already present in their stories, wars, saints, art and heraldry.

Then in 1492, Granada fell.

The last Muslim-ruled kingdom in Iberia disappeared.

That does not mean Moor's heads suddenly disappeared from European heraldry. They clearly did not.

In fact, many survived for centuries.

But 1492 provides a major historical dividing line.

Before it, Moorish people and Muslim political power were living parts of the European Mediterranean world.

After it, the political landscape changed dramatically while the image of the Moor remained frozen on European shields.

THE MONEY BEFORE 1492: CONFISCATION, WAR, EXPULSION AND THE VOYAGE OF COLUMBUS

The year 1492 is usually presented as several separate historical events.

Granada fell.

Spain expelled its Jews.

Christopher Columbus sailed west.

But when the events are placed on the same financial timeline, a larger question appears:

Where did Ferdinand and Isabella obtain the money necessary to fight the Granada War and then immediately begin overseas expansion?

There was unquestionably a redistribution of wealth occurring before and during this period. Jewish communities had endured expulsions, confiscations, special taxation and forced losses of property in Europe for centuries. In Spain itself, the Inquisition added another mechanism through which property could be confiscated.

What cannot yet be demonstrated is the simple claim that confiscated Jewish property directly paid for Columbus's ships. The surviving evidence shows a more complicated financial system involving taxation, Church revenues, loans, Jewish and converso financiers, royal revenues and confiscated property.

1096 — THE FIRST CRUSADE

During the First Crusade, Jewish communities in the Rhineland, including Mainz, Worms and Speyer, were attacked.

People were killed, forcibly converted or displaced, and property was plundered.

This begins our timeline because attacks on Jewish communities were frequently economic events as well as religious ones.

1182 — JEWS EXPELLED FROM THE FRENCH ROYAL DOMAIN

King Philip II expelled Jews from his royal territories.

Jewish property was confiscated and financial obligations involving Jewish lenders were appropriated or reorganized by royal authority.

This establishes an important medieval pattern: expulsion could produce an immediate transfer of property and financial claims.

1215 — FOURTH LATERAN COUNCIL

The Fourth Lateran Council imposed additional restrictions on Jewish life in Christian Europe.

These measures were not themselves a massive confiscation, but they belong in the development of the legal and religious environment that increasingly separated Jewish communities from Christian society.

1290 — JEWS EXPELLED FROM ENGLAND

Edward I ordered the Jews expelled from England.

Property, houses, debts and financial claims were affected by the expulsion.

Again we see the same general mechanism: a population is removed while its accumulated economic interests cannot simply travel with it intact.

1306 — JEWS EXPELLED FROM FRANCE

Philip IV ordered the arrest and expulsion of French Jews.

Their property was confiscated and the Crown acquired claims to debts owed to Jewish lenders.

This is one of the clearest examples of a ruler deriving revenue from the removal of a Jewish population.

1348–1351 — BLACK DEATH

During the Black Death, Jews were falsely accused of poisoning wells and causing the plague.

Jewish communities were destroyed across portions of Europe. People were massacred, expelled or displaced.

Property belonging to destroyed communities changed hands.

1391 — SPAIN'S GREAT ANTI-JEWISH VIOLENCE

In 1391, enormous violence against Jewish communities erupted in Seville and spread through Castile and Aragon.

Many Jews were killed. Others converted to Christianity.

This created a much larger population of conversos, Christians of Jewish ancestry.

That becomes extremely important later because the Spanish Inquisition initially concentrated heavily on conversos suspected of secretly practicing Judaism.

1449 — "PURITY OF BLOOD"

Toledo adopted an early limpieza de sangre, or "purity of blood," measure directed against conversos.

The measure excluded them from public positions and included the possibility of confiscating their goods. Encyclopedia.com

The distinction was increasingly becoming one of ancestry rather than simply current religious practice.

1469 — FERDINAND AND ISABELLA

Isabella of Castile married Ferdinand of Aragon.

Their dynastic partnership eventually brought much of Christian Iberia under their combined rule.

These are the monarchs at the center of all three events we are following:

Granada

the Jewish expulsion

Columbus

1478 — THE SPANISH INQUISITION IS AUTHORIZED

Pope Sixtus IV authorized Ferdinand and Isabella to establish the Spanish Inquisition.

Unlike earlier inquisitorial institutions, this one operated under substantial royal control. 1480–1481 — THE INQUISITION BEGINS OPERATING

The first tribunal was established at Seville.

Its early targets were overwhelmingly conversos accused of secretly practicing Judaism.

And here the financial issue becomes important.

People convicted of heresy could have their property confiscated. Historical accounts explicitly document confiscation as part of the inquisitorial system.

Therefore, by the 1480s, religious prosecution and property transfer were operating simultaneously. 1482–1492 — THE GRANADA WAR

Ferdinand and Isabella then fought a roughly decade-long war against the Nasrid Kingdom of Granada, the last Muslim kingdom in Iberia.

War required enormous amounts of money.

Soldiers had to be paid.

Armies had to be supplied.

Fortifications, horses, artillery, transportation and provisions all required financing.

Modern scholarship on Castilian public finance identifies the Granada campaign as an important moment in the development of Crown borrowing. The Catholic Monarchs required loans to conduct the conquest.

Church revenues were also extremely important. Economic historians have concluded that the Granada conquest was financed largely through ecclesiastical taxation.

So there was no single pot of "Granada money."

There were taxes, Church revenues, borrowing and private financiers.

And some of those financiers are extremely interesting. JEWISH FINANCIERS WERE HELPING FINANCE GRANADA

Isaac Abravanel, one of the most important Jewish financiers of the period, entered the service of Ferdinand and Isabella.

Abravanel and Abraham Senior helped farm royal revenues and provision the royal army.

Historical sources record Abravanel advancing substantial sums to the government during the Granada War.

That gives us an extraordinary situation.

Jewish financiers were helping finance the monarchy's war against Muslim Granada shortly before that same monarchy expelled the Jews.

JANUARY 2, 1492 — GRANADA FALLS

Granada surrendered.

The Library of Congress describes 1492 as the year in which Ferdinand and Isabella conquered the last Muslim kingdom, expelled Jews who refused conversion, and sponsored Columbus's voyage.

The Granada War was finally over.

But the Crown had just emerged from a very expensive military campaign.

That matters enormously to what happened next.

MARCH 31, 1492 — THE ALHAMBRA DECREE

Less than three months after Granada surrendered, Ferdinand and Isabella issued the Edict of Expulsion.

Jews who would not convert were required to leave their kingdoms.

Suddenly families had only months to dispose of property accumulated over generations.

  • Homes.
  • Land.
  • Businesses.
  • Furniture.
  • Synagogues and communal property.
  • Financial claims.

Everything could not simply be carried out of Spain.

SPRING AND SUMMER 1492 — FORCED LIQUIDATION

The expulsion created conditions in which Jewish property could be obtained extremely cheaply or lost altogether.

Cambridge's The Expulsion of the Jews from Spain reproduces documentary evidence of Jewish families unable to recover the value of houses for which they had already paid substantial sums.

Other records document Jewish communal property being sold after the decree.

That does not mean every house went directly into Ferdinand and Isabella's treasury.

The beneficiaries could include purchasers, creditors, local authorities, nobles, institutions and the Crown.

So what occurred was a large forced redistribution of property, not simply one royal cash seizure.

AND THEN COMES COLUMBUS

Columbus had spent years attempting to obtain sponsorship for his proposed western voyage.

Portugal had rejected him.

Negotiations in Spain repeatedly stalled.

Then Granada fell.

Columbus's proposal was reconsidered.

One historical account preserved by the Library of Congress describes Isabella saying that royal finances needed time to recover from the drain caused by the conquest of Granada.

Then Luis de Santángel intervened.

LUIS DE SANTÁNGEL

Santángel was an important royal finance official associated with Ferdinand.

He came from a converso family of Jewish ancestry.

And he became one of the decisive supporters of Columbus.

The historical account preserved by the Library of Congress describes Santángel offering to advance the money necessary for the enterprise when royal finances were strained after Granada.

This is much more interesting than the familiar story that Queen Isabella simply sold or pawned her jewels.

Two finance officials, Santángel and Alonso de Quintanilla, were among Columbus's crucial supporters at court.

Santángel's importance is demonstrated by another remarkable fact.

When Columbus returned from his voyage, one of his famous reports announcing what he had encountered was addressed to:

Luis de Santángel.

A surviving version of that letter is held by the Library of Congress.

THE EXTRAORDINARY 1492 SEQUENCE

Put everything together chronologically:

1480 — Spanish Inquisition begins operating

1482–1492 — Granada War

1480s — Inquisition prosecutes conversos and confiscates property

1480s–1492 — Jewish financiers including Abravanel and Senior assist the monarchy financially

January 2, 1492 — Granada falls

March 31, 1492 — Jewish expulsion decree issued

Spring–summer 1492 — Jewish families forced to liquidate property before departure

April 1492 — Columbus's agreement with Ferdinand and Isabella finalized

August 3, 1492 — Columbus sails

October 12, 1492 — Columbus reaches the Caribbean

The chronology is not speculation. These events genuinely sit almost on top of one another.

Columbus himself connected the events in his account. A historical edition preserved by the Library of Congress notes that Columbus discussed the conquest of Granada and the expulsion of the Jews while describing the circumstances surrounding his commission to sail west.Trollskull Alley Noire [ENG/ITA] - Dungeon Masters Guild | Dungeon ...

WAS THERE A FINANCIAL WINDFALL?

There was unquestionably a major redistribution of wealth.

Property was confiscated through inquisitorial convictions.

Jewish families forced into exile had to dispose of assets rapidly.

Jewish communal property changed hands.

The Crown was collecting taxes.

Church revenues were being directed toward warfare.

The monarchy was borrowing from financiers.

Jewish and converso financiers themselves occupied important positions inside this financial system.

But we should stop one step short of saying:

"Ferdinand and Isabella stole Jewish money and used it to pay Columbus."

I don't see evidence strong enough to make that statement.

The more defensible finding is actually more interesting.

The monarchy had just completed an expensive ten-year war. Contemporary historical accounts describe its finances as strained by Granada. At the same moment, the Inquisition was confiscating property, Spain's Jewish population was being expelled and forced to liquidate assets, and the monarchy was relying on sophisticated Jewish and converso financiers.

Then, within months, Spain launched Columbus.

THE BIGGER PICTURE

1492 marks a transfer of Spanish attention from one frontier to another.

For centuries, Christian kingdoms had expanded southward across Iberia.

In January 1492, that territorial frontier effectively reached its conclusion with Granada.

Seven months later, Columbus sailed west.

And Spain's expansion increasingly moved across the Atlantic.

The Library of Congress itself places the conquest of Granada, expulsion of the Jews and Columbus's voyage together as defining developments of 1492

1316 — Freising Black/Moor's Head

The Black/Moor's head appears in the heraldic tradition associated with Freising, Bavaria.

1323 — Saint Maurice Connection Documented at Coburg

A connection between Coburg and Saint Maurice is documented.

1354–1370 — Coburg Black Saint Maurice Head

The Black head associated with Saint Maurice appears in Coburg's heraldic tradition.

1492 — Granada Falls

Granada, the last Muslim kingdom in Iberia, falls to the Catholic Monarchs Ferdinand and Isabella.

1492 — Columbus Sets Sail

Christopher Columbus sails west across the Atlantic under the sponsorship of the Spanish Crown.

1506 — Swiss Guard Arrives at the Vatican

The first 150 Swiss Guards arrive in Rome and enter the service of Pope Julius II. The Vatican recognizes 1506 as the official founding year of the Pontifical Swiss Guard.

1527 — Narváez Expedition Begins

The Narváez expedition sets out for Spanish North America.

1528 — Esteban/Estevanico Arrives in Florida

Esteban, also known as Estevanico, was a Moroccan man who arrived in Florida with the Narváez expedition. He is traditionally identified as Muslim and represents one of the earliest documented people from Muslim North Africa to reach what is now the United States.

1528 — Gulf Coast and Texas

After the Narváez expedition collapses, Esteban and a small number of survivors travel and are shipwrecked along the Gulf Coast, eventually reaching present-day Texas.

1536 — Esteban Reaches Spanish Territory in Mexico

After years of extraordinary travel across the continent, Esteban and the other survivors reach Spanish-controlled territory in Mexico.

1539 — Esteban Reaches the American Southwest

Esteban travels north into what is now Arizona and New Mexico and reaches Hawikuh, a Zuni pueblo.

1609 — Henry Hudson Explores for the Dutch

Henry Hudson, sailing for the Dutch East India Company, explores New York Harbor and the Hudson River for the Dutch.

1625–1626 — New Amsterdam Established

New Amsterdam is established on Manhattan. The settlement eventually becomes New York City.

1664 — New Amsterdam Becomes New York

The English seize New Amsterdam from the Dutch and rename it New York.

1773 — First Mental Hospital in Colonial America

The Public Hospital for Persons of Insane and Disordered Minds opens in Williamsburg, Virginia, the first public institution in British North America devoted exclusively to treating mentally ill patients.

1775 — American Revolution Begins

The American Revolutionary War begins.

1790s — Top Hat Emerges in Britain

The top hat begins appearing in Britain and develops into an important element of fashionable male dress.

Before 1800 — Precursors of the Fez

Brimless, flat-topped caps recognizable as predecessors or relatives of the later standardized fez were worn around the Mediterranean and North Africa.

Early 1800s — Recognizable Red Fez in Use

The recognizable red fez was already being worn before it became standardized as Ottoman official headwear.

1820s–1900s — The Top Hat Becomes an Elite Symbol

The top hat becomes strongly associated with wealthy, upper-class, professional and formal male dress.

1826/1827 — First Surviving Camera Photograph

Nicéphore Niépce produces the earliest surviving photograph made with a camera.

1826 — Ottoman Clothing Reforms Begin

Sultan Mahmud II begins major military and clothing reforms that ultimately establish the fez as a prominent symbol of the modernizing Ottoman state.

1829 — Fez Becomes Standard Ottoman Official Headwear

Ottoman dress regulations establish the fez as standard male official headwear.

1830 — Indian Removal Act

President Andrew Jackson signs the Indian Removal Act.

1840s–1850s — New Orleans Becomes a Major Immigration Port

New Orleans becomes the second-leading immigrant port in the United States after New York. Large numbers of Irish and German immigrants enter the country through the city.

1840s–1860s — Early American Moorish Revival

Moorish Revival architecture begins appearing prominently in the United States. Architects and wealthy patrons borrow forms associated with Islamic Spain and North Africa, including horseshoe arches, domes, minarets and elaborate geometric ornament.

P. T. Barnum's spectacular Iranistan, completed in 1848, becomes one of the most memorable early American examples.

1854–1929 — Orphan Train Movement

Hundreds of thousands of children are relocated from crowded Eastern cities to families and communities elsewhere in the United States through what becomes known collectively as the Orphan Train Movement.

1855–1890 — Castle Garden Immigration Era

Castle Garden in Manhattan serves as New York's major immigrant processing center. More than eight million immigrants pass through during this period.

Italian and Eastern European Jewish immigration is comparatively small during the earlier decades but rises dramatically toward the end of the Castle Garden era.

More than 200,000 Eastern European Jews arrive in the United States during the 1880s. The much larger migration follows: more than 300,000 arrive during the 1890s and more than 1.5 million between 1900 and 1914.

1860s–1890s — Major American Moorish Revival Period

Moorish Revival architecture becomes especially prominent in American synagogues while also appearing in residences, clubs and public buildings.

Important surviving examples include Cincinnati's Plum Street Temple, completed in 1866, and New York's Central Synagogue, completed in 1872.

1861–1865 — American Civil War

The United States fights the Civil War.

1864 — Circassian Expulsion

The mass expulsion and displacement of Circassians from the Russian Empire reaches its culmination.

1865 — Slavery Abolished

The 13th Amendment is ratified on December 6, 1865, abolishing slavery throughout the United States except as punishment for crime.

1870s–Early 1900s — Gilded Age

The United States undergoes enormous industrial expansion, accumulation of private fortunes, immigration and urban growth.

1871 — Great Chicago Fire

The Great Chicago Fire devastates a large portion of the city.

1872 — Shriners Founded in the United States

The organization later widely known as the Shriners is founded as the Ancient Arabic Order of the Nobles of the Mystic Shrine, or AAONMS.

Its imagery and terminology draw heavily upon romanticized American ideas about the Middle East and North Africa.

1890s–1930s — Second Major Wave of American Moorish Revival

Moorish imagery expands dramatically into theaters, hotels, clubs, residences and Shriners' temples.

American cities acquire enormous domes, minarets, horseshoe arches and buildings carrying names such as Alhambra, Granada, Morocco, Mecca and Medina.

1906 — O. W. Gurley and Greenwood

O. W. Gurley purchases land in Tulsa and becomes instrumental in developing the Greenwood district.

1910s — Greenwood and "Black Wall Street"

Greenwood develops into an exceptionally prosperous Black business district, eventually becoming famous as "Black Wall Street."

1912 — Titanic Sinks

RMS Titanic sinks in the North Atlantic.

1913 — Federal Reserve Established

The Federal Reserve System is created in the United States.

1914–1918 — World War I

The First World War transforms Europe and the international political order.

1915–1917 — Armenian Genocide

The Ottoman government carries out mass deportations and killings of Armenians during World War I.

1920–1933 — Prohibition

The manufacture, sale and transportation of alcoholic beverages are constitutionally prohibited in the United States.

1920s — Peak of Spectacular American Moorish Revival Architecture

Large theaters, Shriners' temples and entertainment buildings make Moorish-inspired domes, minarets, arches and exoticized Middle Eastern imagery highly visible throughout American cities.

1921 — Tulsa Race Massacre

White mobs attack Tulsa's Greenwood district, killing residents and destroying much of the prosperous Black community.

1920s — Early Purpose-Built Mosques in the United States

Purpose-built Muslim mosques begin appearing in the United States during this period, including early congregations and mosque buildings established by immigrant Muslim communities.

1925 — Turkey Bans the Fez

Under Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, Turkey adopts the Hat Law as part of its sweeping modernization program. The fez, closely associated with the former Ottoman order, is effectively eliminated from official and mainstream public male dress.

1929 — Wall Street Crash

The stock market crashes, helping mark the beginning of the Great Depression.

1933 — Prohibition Repealed

The 21st Amendment repeals the 18th Amendment, ending nationwide Prohibition.

c. 1240 — BLACK SAINT MAURICE, MAGDEBURG

At Magdeburg Cathedral in Germany, Saint Maurice was depicted as a Black African soldier around 1240. Maurice was traditionally associated with the Roman Theban Legion and Egypt. This sculpture is important because it is generally regarded as the earliest surviving European depiction of Saint Maurice unmistakably as a Black African.

So by about 1240, Black Saint Maurice imagery was already present inside the Holy Roman Empire.

1316 — FREISING BLACK/MOOR'S HEAD

About 75 years later, another Black head appears in German heraldry.

In Freising, Bavaria, the arms of the Bishop of Freising contained the crowned Black head traditionally called the Moor of Freising. It was also called Caput Aethiopum, meaning "head of an Ethiopian."

This is the Black head that Joseph Ratzinger later adopted when he became Archbishop of Munich and Freising in 1977. It eventually appeared on his coat of arms as Pope Benedict XVI.

The important distinction is that the precise origin of the Freising Moor's head is uncertain. It should not automatically be identified as Saint Maurice.

1323 — SAINT MAURICE AT COBURG

Now we move from Freising to Coburg.

In 1323, Coburg's principal church, St. Moriz, is documented. The church was dedicated to Saint Maurice.

So this gives us a documented Saint Maurice connection at Coburg before the Black Maurice head became the city's emblem.

1354–1370 — COBURG BLACK SAINT MAURICE HEAD

In 1353, Coburg passed into the possession of the House of Wettin.

Immediately afterward, Saint Maurice began appearing in Coburg's civic imagery and coinage.

Coburg dates the establishment of the Black head of Saint Maurice as its civic emblem to approximately 1354–1370.

So by the later 1300s we have two separate Black heads in what is now Bavaria:

Freising — Moor's head.

Coburg — Saint Maurice.

1492 — GRANADA FALLS

Now jump forward about 120 years.

For centuries, Muslim dynasties commonly described in European history as the Moors had controlled portions of the Iberian Peninsula.

By the late 1400s, Granada was the last Muslim-ruled kingdom there.

On January 2, 1492, Granada surrendered to the forces of Ferdinand of Aragon and Isabella of Castile.

That ended Muslim political rule in Iberia.

THE TWO BLACK HEADS: FREISING, COBURG AND MEDIEVAL GERMANY

Two separate Black heads appear in German heraldry during the Middle Ages. One is associated with Freising and eventually appears on the coat of arms of Joseph Ratzinger, Pope Benedict XVI. The other belongs to Coburg and represents Saint Maurice.

Both places are today in Bavaria, Germany. The symbols are different, but they appear within a relatively short period of one another.

BEFORE FREISING AND COBURG: SAINT MAURICE

The story goes back farther than either coat of arms.

Saint Maurice was a Christian soldier and martyr traditionally associated with the Theban Legion and Egypt. During the Middle Ages he became an important saint within the Holy Roman Empire.

An extraordinary change occurred in German religious art around 1240.

At Magdeburg Cathedral, Saint Maurice was portrayed unmistakably as a Black African man. This medieval sculpture is generally regarded as the earliest surviving European representation of Saint Maurice as Black.

This is important because it predates both the Freising and Coburg Black heads.

So the German Black-head imagery was already developing during the 1200s.

FREDERICK II AND THE MEDITERRANEAN WORLD

This was also the period of Holy Roman Emperor Frederick II, who died in 1250.

Frederick's political world was very different from the picture we sometimes have of an isolated medieval Germany.

He was Holy Roman Emperor but was also King of Sicily. Sicily sat directly in the Mediterranean world and had centuries of interaction among Christians, Muslims, Jews, Arabs, North Africans, Greeks and Europeans.

Frederick maintained diplomatic and political relationships with Muslim rulers and had Muslims within his Sicilian realm and court.

That means German imperial society was not disconnected from Africa or the Muslim Mediterranean when Black Saint Maurice imagery appeared.

Exactly why Saint Maurice began being represented as Black remains debated, but the historical setting is important.

FREISING BLACK HEAD — 1316

The first of the two heads we have been following appears in Freising.

By 1316, the arms of the Bishop of Freising contained a Black head.

The traditional name was the Moor of Freising.

It was also described as:

Caput Aethiopum

meaning approximately:

"Head of an Ethiopian."

This is the Black head that centuries later Joseph Ratzinger incorporated into his own episcopal coat of arms and then retained when he became Pope Benedict XVI.

Freising is in Bavaria, near Munich.

The important date is:

1316 — Freising Black/Moor's head documented.

The exact historical reason the bishops of Freising originally selected this particular symbol is not completely settled. Several explanations have been proposed over the centuries.

COBURG BLACK HEAD — 1354–1370

A few decades later another Black head appears in Coburg.

Coburg's Black head represents Saint Maurice.

Saint Maurice was already connected with Coburg's principal church, St. Moriz, which is documented by 1323.

A major political change followed.

In 1353, Coburg came under the control of the House of Wettin.

Shortly afterward Saint Maurice began appearing on Coburg coins.

Coburg dates the adoption of the Maurice head as its civic emblem to approximately:

1354–1370.

The Black head eventually became the familiar coat of arms of Coburg.

Coburg is today also in Bavaria, although considerably farther north than Freising, close to Thuringia.

TWO BLACK HEADS WITHIN ABOUT HALF A CENTURY

We therefore have two separate heraldic traditions:

1316 — Freising

The Black or Moor's head appears in the arms of the Bishop of Freising.

1354–1370 — Coburg

The Black head of Saint Maurice becomes Coburg's civic emblem.

They are not the same coat of arms and they do not represent exactly the same thing.

But they occur in the same broader medieval German world and within roughly 40–50 years of each other.

And behind both of them lies an earlier development:

c. 1240 — Black Saint Maurice at Magdeburg Cathedral.

WHY BAVARIA?

In the 1300s there was no unified country called Germany in the modern sense.

These territories belonged to the enormous and politically fragmented Holy Roman Empire.

Bishops could exercise considerable political power. Some controlled territories, collected revenues and participated directly in imperial politics.

Freising itself was a prince-bishopric.

Therefore a religious symbol could simultaneously function as a political, territorial and governmental symbol.

Black or African imagery was also not unknown within medieval German Christianity. By this period Saint Maurice had already become one of its most important examples.

The Vatican itself describes the Freising symbol as part of an old Bavarian heraldic tradition and identifies it historically as the Moor of Freising.

THE MOORS AND THE LARGER EUROPEAN WORLD

At the same time these symbols were appearing in Germany, Christian Europe had extensive contact with Muslim-controlled territories.

The word Moor was used by Europeans in different periods for Muslim populations associated particularly with North Africa and Iberia. Those populations were not one race or ethnicity. They included North African Berbers, Arabs and other populations.

Muslim governments had controlled portions of the Iberian Peninsula beginning in 711.

By the 1300s, Christian kingdoms had already conquered most Muslim-controlled Iberian territory, but Granada remained under the Muslim Nasrid dynasty.

Therefore when the Freising Black head appears in 1316, and when the Coburg Black head appears several decades later, the Moorish presence in Europe was not ancient history.

It was contemporary.

Christian and Muslim powers were simultaneously fighting, trading, negotiating and interacting throughout the Mediterranean.

1492

That brings the timeline to the famous year 1492.

In January 1492, Granada fell to Ferdinand II of Aragon and Isabella I of Castile.

This ended the last Muslim-ruled kingdom on the Iberian Peninsula.

The same year brought several enormous developments.

The Spanish monarchy ordered the expulsion of practicing Jews who refused conversion.

Christopher Columbus sailed west under Spanish sponsorship.

European expansion across the Atlantic accelerated.

So 1492 sits at the end of a much longer medieval period involving Christian Europe, Muslim Iberia, North Africa and the Mediterranean.

THE TIMELINE

c. 1240

Black Saint Maurice appears at Magdeburg Cathedral in the Holy Roman Empire.

1250

Holy Roman Emperor Frederick II dies. His imperial world had included Sicily and extensive interaction with Muslim Mediterranean society.

1316

The Freising Black/Moor's head is documented in the arms of the Bishop of Freising.

1323

Coburg's St. Moriz Church, dedicated to Saint Maurice, is documented.

1353

Coburg passes to the House of Wettin.

1354–1370

The Black head of Saint Maurice becomes Coburg's civic emblem.

1492

Granada falls, ending the last Muslim kingdom in Iberia.

The sequence therefore runs from the appearance of the Black Saint Maurice in 1200s Germany, through two different Black-head heraldic traditions in the 1300s, and into the much larger European transformation surrounding 1492.

THE BEAR ON RATZINGER'S COAT OF ARMS

The bear on Joseph Ratzinger's coat of arms did not begin with Ratzinger. It belongs to the much older Catholic history of Saint Corbinian and Freising, Bavaria, Germany. Corbinian lived approximately 680–730, while Ratzinger did not adopt the bear until 1977. Pasted markdown

Freising is still a city today. It is in Bavaria, Germany, about 19 miles north of Munich. Its importance to this story comes from its long history as a Catholic religious center. Saint Corbinian became closely associated with Freising, and the bear connected with his legend eventually became one of the recognizable symbols of the city and its Catholic history.

ABOUT 720 — SAINT CORBINIAN AND THE BEAR

Saint Corbinian was an early Christian missionary and bishop associated with Freising.

According to the traditional story, Corbinian was traveling to Rome when a bear attacked and killed his horse. Corbinian subdued the bear and made it take the horse's place. His baggage was placed on the bear, and the animal was required to carry the load on the journey.

This is the origin of the animal known as Corbinian's bear.

The important feature is not simply that it is a bear. It is a bear carrying a load. The baggage on its back identifies it with the Corbinian story.

The Vatican still tells this story in its official explanation of Benedict XVI's coat of arms. Pasted markdown

EARLY 900s — THE BEAR STORY IS WRITTEN DOWN

The Corbinian bear story was not created during the modern period.

An expanded version of the Life of Saint Corbinian, written at the beginning of the 10th century, contains the bear episode. This means the written tradition of Corbinian and the bear is approximately 1,100 years old.

The traditional event is placed around 720, while the surviving written account comes from roughly two centuries later. Those are two different dates: the first is the traditional date of the story, and the second is when the bear story can be documented in writing.

1300s — THE BEAR BECOMES PART OF FREISING'S HERALDRY

By the 1300s, Corbinian's bear was appearing in the heraldic tradition of Freising.

A Freising city seal containing the bear is recorded in 1330, although that particular seal has not survived.

The earliest surviving seal impression showing the bear dates from 1362. The animal is shown carrying the characteristic bundle on its back.

The bundle matters because it distinguishes this bear from a generic heraldic bear. It refers directly to the story of the bear being required to carry Corbinian's baggage.

By this period the bear was firmly connected with Catholic Freising.

Its documented history is tied to Saint Corbinian and Freising.

There was also another old Freising symbol: the crowned Black head known as the Moor of Freising. That symbol is firmly documented by 1316. The Moor of Freising and Corbinian's bear eventually appeared together in Ratzinger's coat of arms, but they have separate histories. The presence of one does not establish the origin of the other. Pasted markdown

1835 — THE WILD BEARS DISAPPEAR

There is an important difference between the symbolic bear of Freising and the history of actual wild bears in Bavaria.

The last wild brown bear in Bavaria was killed in 1835.

Wild brown bears then disappeared from Bavaria for approximately 170 years.

During those years, Corbinian's bear did not disappear. It continued as a historical, religious and heraldic symbol even though actual wild brown bears were no longer living in Bavaria.

This creates two completely separate histories. One is the ancient and medieval history of Corbinian's symbolic bear. The other is the biological history of real brown bears in Bavaria

1977 — JOSEPH RATZINGER ADOPTS THE BEAR

Joseph Ratzinger became Archbishop of Munich and Freising in 1977.

When he became archbishop, he incorporated two old Freising symbols into his own coat of arms: the Moor of Freising and Corbinian's bear.

Ratzinger therefore did not invent either symbol. He deliberately adopted symbols that already belonged to the historical tradition of Freising. The Vatican specifically states that he incorporated these Bavarian symbols when he became archbishop in 1977. Pasted markdown

Ratzinger later confirmed how important the connection with Freising was to him. In 2010, after being made an honorary citizen of Freising, Benedict XVI spoke about having placed the Moor and the bear of Freising in his coat of arms as an expression of his attachment to the city. Pasted markdown

WHAT THE BEAR MEANT TO RATZINGER

Ratzinger also gave Corbinian's bear a personal meaning.

The old story concerns a bear that is made to carry a burden. Ratzinger interpreted that burden-bearing animal as an image of service and responsibility.

The original symbolism therefore belongs to the story of Saint Corbinian and Freising. Ratzinger then applied that old story to his own life in the Church: he too had been given a burden to carry.

That explains why this particular bear had meaning for him. It was not simply a German bear or a Bavarian bear chosen as decoration. It was the loaded bear of Saint Corbinian, the saint historically associated with Freising.

2005 — RATZINGER BECOMES POPE BENEDICT XVI

Joseph Ratzinger was elected pope in 2005 and became Pope Benedict XVI.

He retained the old Freising imagery in his papal coat of arms. The arrangement changed, but both the Moor of Freising and Corbinian's bear remained. Pasted markdown

This meant that a bear whose tradition reached back to medieval Freising was now displayed on the coat of arms of a modern pope.

By this point, actual wild bears had been absent from Bavaria for about 170 years.

2006 — BRUNO ARRIVES IN BAVARIA

Then, one year after Ratzinger became pope, an entirely separate bear story occurred.

In May 2006, an actual wild brown bear entered Bavaria.

The bear was JJ1, popularly called Bruno.

Bruno had nothing to do with Saint Corbinian's bear, the Freising coat of arms or Ratzinger's heraldry. He was a real wild brown bear moving through the Alpine region.

What made Bruno extraordinary was the timing. Bavaria had been without wild brown bears since the nineteenth century. Bruno was the first wild brown bear seen in Bavaria in roughly 170 years.

His arrival became a major public event in Germany.

JUNE 26, 2006 — BRUNO IS SHOT

Bruno moved through the Bavarian Alps and repeatedly approached areas of human activity. Authorities considered him a potential danger and attempts were made to capture him.

On June 26, 2006, Bruno was shot and killed near the Spitzingsee area in Bavaria.

The Bruno story therefore belongs to the modern history of real bears in Bavaria, not to the religious history of Corbinian's bear.

But the dates put the two separate histories unusually close together.

Ratzinger became Pope Benedict XVI in 2005 while carrying the ancient Freising bear on his papal coat of arms.

In 2006, the first real wild brown bear to appear in Bavaria in roughly 170 years arrived.

That bear was Bruno.

Bruno was shot on June 26, 2006.

THE FULL BEAR HISTORY

Around 720, according to Catholic tradition, Saint Corbinian encountered the bear that killed his horse and subsequently carried his baggage.

By the early 900s, the bear story had been recorded in writing.

By the 1300s, the loaded bear had become established in the symbolism of Catholic Freising.

A Freising bear seal is recorded in 1330, and the earliest surviving seal impression showing the loaded bear dates from 1362.

In 1835, the last wild brown bear in Bavaria was killed.

For approximately the next 170 years, Bavaria had no wild brown bears, although the old symbolic bear of Saint Corbinian remained part of Freising's history.

In 1977, Joseph Ratzinger became Archbishop of Munich and Freising and adopted Corbinian's bear, together with the medieval Moor of Freising, for his coat of arms.

In 2005, Ratzinger became Pope Benedict XVI and retained the bear on his papal coat of arms.

In May 2006, the real brown bear Bruno entered Bavaria, becoming the first wild brown bear seen there in approximately 170 years.

On June 26, 2006, Bruno was shot and killed in Bavaria.

The bear on Ratzinger's coat of arms therefore has a history stretching back more than a thousand years. It began with the Catholic tradition of Saint Corbinian, became an established symbol of Freising, and was personally adopted by Joseph Ratzinger in 1977. Ratzinger carried that medieval symbol into the papacy in 2005.

Bruno belongs to a completely separate story. His importance is that while the symbolic bear had survived in Bavaria for centuries, the actual wild brown bear had disappeared. Bruno's appearance in 2006 marked the return of a real wild brown bear to Bavaria after approximately 170 years.

REFERENCES

Catlos, Brian A. Kingdoms of Faith: A New History of Islamic Spain. New York: Basic Books, 2018.

Constable, Olivia Remie, ed. Medieval Iberia: Readings from Christian, Muslim, and Jewish Sources. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012.

Dodds, Jerrilynn D., María Rosa Menocal, and Abigail Krasner Balbale. The Arts of Intimacy: Christians, Jews, and Muslims in the Making of Castilian Culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2008.

Encyclopaedia Britannica. "Al-Andalus." Encyclopaedia Britannica.

Encyclopaedia Britannica. "Moor." Encyclopaedia Britannica.

Fletcher, Richard. Moorish Spain. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.

Harvey, L. P. Islamic Spain, 1250 to 1500. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.

Harvey, L. P. Muslims in Spain, 1500 to 1614. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.

Kaplan, Paul H. D. The Rise of the Black Magus in Western Art. Ann Arbor: UMI Research Press, 1985.

Kaplan, Paul H. D. "Black Africans in Hohenstaufen Iconography." Gesta 26, no. 1 (1987): 29–36.

Library of Congress. "1492: An Ongoing Voyage." Washington, DC: Library of Congress.

Lowe, Kate. The Lives of Black Africans in Renaissance Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2025.

Menocal, María Rosa. The Ornament of the World: How Muslims, Jews, and Christians Created a Culture of Tolerance in Medieval Spain. Boston: Little, Brown, 2002.

Nirenberg, David. Communities of Violence: Persecution of Minorities in the Middle Ages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.

O'Callaghan, Joseph F. Reconquest and Crusade in Medieval Spain. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2003.

Phillips, William D., Jr., and Carla Rahn Phillips. A Concise History of Spain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

Prescott, William H. History of the Reign of Ferdinand and Isabella, the Catholic. Boston: Phillips, Sampson, 1856.

 

 

Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör Dianne Emerson. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Dianne Emerson och inte av, eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.