The U.S. Cyber Trust Mark could indicate that your next IoT device meets select security requirements. Image courtesy of the FCC.
Our guest this week is Steve Hanna, a distinguished engineer at Infineon and the chair of the security working group at the Connectivity Standards Alliance. He’s on the show to tell us more about the need for a voluntary, government cybersecurity mark for devices, and explain why developing such a mark is so difficult. We talk about the FCC’s role in managing the program, the time frame for a mark, and how the government plans to think about keeping up with the always-changing security landscape. We also discuss how Infineon’s customers are changing their views about IoT security labels, and how the mark relates to work done by the Arm’s PSA security standard and the security elements that are part of the Matter standard. It’s a good interview, made better by the fact that Hanna sounds just like Mr. Rogers.
Hosts: Stacey Higginbotham and Kevin Tofel Guest: Steve Hanna, a distinguished engineer at Infineon Sponsors: Wilderness Labs and Particle
Why we want a U.S. Cyber Trust Mark for consumer devices
What happened to this smart BBQ controller?
Leviton embraces Matter for its switches
Badges, QR codes, and building a layered mark for cybersecurity
Where will privacy fit into any security mark or standard?
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör
Stacey Higginbotham, tech journalist. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Stacey Higginbotham, tech journalist och inte av,
eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.