Wellness and optimisation culture increasingly presents itself as "science-based". But citing studies, using technical language, or having scientific credentials does not guarantee that the underlying evidence is being represented accurately.
In this episode, exercise science researcher Dr. Nick Tiller, discusses how science can be selectively packaged, overstated, and used to support commercially attractive health claims. It explores the difference between science communication and science commodification, why scientific scepticism is distinct from cynicism, how anecdotes and mechanistic explanations can mislead, and why a single peer-reviewed study should never be treated as definitive evidence.
The conversation also looks further upstream at problems within science itself, including low statistical power, p-hacking, publication bias, questionable research practices, and academic incentives that may favour novelty and positive findings. These issues can then be amplified through media, social platforms, and the wellness industry until tentative findings become confident recommendations.
Tiller & Phillips, 2023 – How Skepticism (not Cynicism) Can Raise Scientific Standards and Reform the Health and Wellness Industry
Tiller et al., 2024 – The Nontechnical Summary: A New Initiative to Enhance the Translation of Sports Science Research and Reduce the Spread of Misinformation
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör
Danny Lennon. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Danny Lennon och inte av,
eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.