An AI narration of the article 'Three Views of the Relationship Between Parents and Political Authority' by Jake Desyllas.
Philosophy of the family looks like one of the least political subjects there is. This episode argues the opposite: that it is one of the most political, and that the philosophers who write about parents and children usually have an agenda they are not advertising. The perennial problem for rulers is that obedience has no good justification, and forcing an outnumbered majority is expensive — so it is far cheaper to persuade, and cheapest of all to persuade people while they are children. That raises a question the philosophical tradition has answered in three incompatible ways: are parents the State's allies in producing obedient subjects, an obstacle to be dismantled, or the last line of defence against political authority? This opening episode sets out all three positions and the interests behind them.
First published at https://www.jakedesyllas.com/blog/2025/4/3/three-views-of-the-relationship-between-parents-and-political-authority on 3 April 2025.
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör
Jake Desyllas. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Jake Desyllas och inte av,
eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.