The four-bot portfolio ended the day at -620 yen realized, with no open positions left at the report cutoff. The headline record was 9 wins and 7 losses, so the day was not simply a wipeout. That is what makes it a little more annoying. More wins than losses, yet still a red result.
The total gross profit was +961 yen, while gross loss reached -1,581 yen. The payoff ratio came out to 0.47, and that is the number I kept coming back to. BoundSniper had the largest single loss at -418 yen, GateGrid AI had two heavy cuts after one clean win, and LLMBridgeTrader was the only bot that finished positive. MLScore GF-T4 GB had no trades, which honestly may have been the quietest result on the sheet.
Bot-by-bot results
■ GateGrid AI -604 yenRecord: 1W / 2LWin rate: 33.3%Gross profit: +117 yenGross loss: -721 yenPayoff ratio: 0.32Max loss: -398 yen
■ BoundSniper Bot -144 yenRecord: 4W / 2LWin rate: 66.7%Gross profit: +278 yenGross loss: -422 yenPayoff ratio: 0.33Max loss: -418 yen
■ LLMBridgeTrader +128 yenRecord: 4W / 3LWin rate: 57.1%Gross profit: +566 yenGross loss: -438 yenPayoff ratio: 0.97Max loss: -195 yen
■ MLScore GF-T4 GB 0 yenRecord: 0W / 0LWin rate: N/AGross profit: 0 yenGross loss: 0 yenPayoff ratio: N/AMax loss: N/ANote: No trades
■ Total -620 yen realizedRecord: 9W / 7LWin rate: 56.3%Gross profit: +961 yenGross loss: -1,581 yenPayoff ratio: 0.47Max loss: -418 yenFloating P/L: 0 yenEquity impact: -620 yen
Today’s theme: the win count looked fine, the loss size did not
Today was another reminder that a trading bot can be directionally useful and still lose money if the sizing of wins and losses is off. The portfolio won more often than it lost. That should give some room to breathe, but the losses were too heavy for the winners to cover.
The most awkward part was BoundSniper. It won 4 out of 6 trades and still finished at -144 yen because one USDJPY loss of -418 yen swallowed almost every small win around it. GateGrid AI had a simpler version of the same problem: one +117 yen win, followed by -323 yen and -398 yen. I saw that -398 yen and had the same reaction as the past few reports. The entry may not be the whole issue anymore.
GateGrid AI: one early win, then the basket broke
GateGrid AI had three closed GBPUSD trades. The first exit was +117 yen, which looked fine. Then the next two exits came in at -323 yen and -398 yen, leaving the bot at -604 yen for the day.
This bot is built as a multi-filter grid system. CatBoost judges entry probability, then Ollama checks context such as ATR, spread, higher-timeframe direction, session, and recent performance before the grid is allowed to form. That design is supposed to reduce weak participation, and I still like the idea. But the realized results are again pointing toward exit handling, not only entry filtering.
The two losing closes were much larger than the one win. The average win was 117 yen, while the average loss was 360.5 yen. A payoff ratio of 0.32 does not leave much room for error. If the grid is going to take small profits, it needs a sharper way to say the setup has failed before the loss reaches three times the normal winner.
BoundSniper Bot: good win rate, one loss did too much damage
BoundSniper Bot closed six USDJPY trades and won four of them. The winning trades were +128 yen, +50 yen, +42 yen, and +58 yen. The losses were -418 yen and -4 yen. The result was -144 yen.
This one stung in a different way. A 66.7% win rate should not automatically end red, but the largest loss was almost exactly the size of the four winners combined. That -418 yen trade did the damage. The final -4 yen loss was basically noise; the day was decided by the bigger miss.
BoundSniper is a TradingView execution bridge rather than an AI decision system. It receives signals and sends them to MT5, so the key question is upstream exit design. The bridge worked. The trade logic it carried allowed one losing idea to sit too deep.
LLMBridgeTrader: the only positive bot, but still not clean
LLMBridgeTrader finished at +128 yen on EURUSD. It closed 7 trades, with 4 wins and 3 losses. The winners were +206 yen, +128 yen, +130 yen, and +102 yen. The losses were -115 yen, -128 yen, and -195 yen.
This was the best-shaped bot of the day, even though it was not flawless. The payoff ratio was 0.97, which is close to balanced, and the win rate was 57.1%. Compared with GateGrid and BoundSniper, the losses were not wildly larger than the wins. The -195 yen loss was still noticeable, but it did not erase the whole day by itself.
Because this bot asks the LLM for OPEN, HOLD, CLOSE, REVERSE, confidence, setup type, and SL/TP ideas, I care less about whether it wins one trade and more about whether it can keep its decision cycle stable. Today, it did that better than the others. Not perfect, but less lopsided.
MLScore GF-T4 GB: no trades, no new information
MLScore GF-T4 GB had no trades today. That means no realized profit, no realized loss, and no floating position. There is not much to analyze from the daily report.
Still, “no trade” is not meaningless in a multi-bot setup. After several days where single large losses had a strong effect, sitting out can be a valid result. I cannot credit the bot for avoiding a specific bad setup without the signal log, but the account did not take damage from this lane today.
Closing thoughts
Today’s total loss was not huge, but the structure was familiar. More wins than losses, yet the day ended red. That is usually not a mystery. It means the system is paying too much when it is wrong.
LLMBridgeTrader was the only bot that produced a healthier balance between wins and losses. GateGrid AI and BoundSniper both showed the same uncomfortable pattern from different architectures: small wins, one or two outsized hits. The lesson is getting less subtle now. The next improvement is probably not “find more entries.” It is making the bad exits less expensive.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit fxaibotlab.substack.com
