Julia Freeland Fisher is Director of Education Research at the Clayton Christensen Institute, the nonpartisan think tank built on Clayton Christensen's theory of disruptive innovation, where she has spent 13 years making the case that who students know matters as much as what they know. She holds a BA from Princeton and a JD from Yale Law School — a credential she cheerfully calls "a very expensive detour," having decided along the way that she did not want to be a lawyer.

She began her career in 2007 at NewSchools Venture Fund, at the height of the No Child Left Behind era, when American education reform was measured almost entirely in test scores and graduation rates. Looking at the world of work, she noticed that networks quietly determined who got jobs, internships and promotions — and that this was completely absent from the reform conversation. She joined the Christensen Institute in 2013 to incubate the idea nobody was funding: social capital as a measurable, buildable education outcome. She is the author of Who You Know: Unlocking Innovations That Expand Students' Networks (Wiley), co-written with her husband Daniel Fisher, with a foreword by Clayton Christensen.

Today her work sits at the intersection of social capital and AI. She writes Connection Error on Substack, on how AI is changing our relationships and how our relationships are changing AI. Her latest report, Prosocial Possibilities: Building Tech That Builds Students' Connections (with Anna Arsenault, published August 2026), documents a project with 10 ed tech platforms testing prosocial features and functionalities in the college and career guidance space. She is also running an early-stage Jobs to Be Done study with Bob Moesta on what actually drives demand for AI companionship among 18–24 year olds.

In this episode, Julia talks with Svenia Busson about:

  • Why relationships are the thing everyone in education agrees about and no one is accountable for — no budget line, no outcome metric, nobody's job
  • AI companions as a textbook case of disruptive innovation — the risk comes less from the technology than from how flagrantly we've neglected human connection
  • What prosocial AI looks like in practice — Protopia, Road Trip Nation, Climb Together and Uprooted Academy
  • The four "jobs to be done" behind AI companionship in her study with Bob Moesta — and why not one young person used the word "loneliness"
  • Fear of burdening others as the most potent force pushing teens toward chatbots, both pushing and pulling
  • Why measurement alone won't save human connection — "what gets valued gets measured gets done" — and where the Search Institute's Developmental Relationships Framework and Harvard's relationship mapping fit in
  • The 75+ US state bills regulating AI companionship, warning labels that miss the point, and federal cuts to outdoor education as two sides of the same coin
  • Help-seeking and networking as the most neglected "skill of the future" — the Connected Scholars curriculum tripled graduation rates, and no employer ever asks for it


The AI conversation education is missing: relationships are the real disruption.

Links mentioned in this episode


Rss
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör Svenia Busson & Laurent Jolie. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Svenia Busson & Laurent Jolie och inte av, eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.