Federal agencies secretly used politically charged keywords—like “diversity,” “gender,” and “vaccine hesitancy”—to flag and terminate UC research grants, sparking a $2 billion lawsuit. Researchers argue this was unconstitutional censorship, targeting politically inconvenient science without due process or individualized review. Lawyers claim grants were canceled based on location, not merit, and that billions were illegally withheld, violating spending laws. A judge has already sided with the professors, restoring grants previously revoked over antisemitism and transgender sports claims. Now, the legal team seeks a final ruling to permanently reinstate funding, warning that this precedent could cripple scientific progress and violate First Amendment rights by silencing specific viewpoints.
Listen in comfort: Get a discount on a Soli Pillow: http://solipillow.com/discount/dnn.
Advertise on DNN: advertise@thednn.ai
This is an automated, high-level news summary based on public reporting. Report issues to feedback@thednn.ai.
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör
The Daily News Now!. Innehållet i podden är skapat av The Daily News Now! och inte av,
eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.
