Can you improve your endurance by sitting in a hot tub instead of doing another hard workout? We dig into a study that put elite runners through five weeks of what we affectionately call “endurance hot tubbing” to see whether heat alone could trigger the same cardiovascular adaptations as altitude training. Along the way, we explore crossover study designs, multiple testing, why significant physiological changes don’t necessarily translate into better athletic performance, and how an exploratory regression analysis ended up answering the wrong scientific question. We also discover that serious hot tub research involves surprisingly little relaxation, debate whether bubbles should count as an experimental condition, and learn why distance runners pay good money to sleep in tents with some of the oxygen sucked out.
Statistical topics
best subsets regression
causal inference
crossover studies
exploratory analyses
mediation / mechanisms
model specification
multiple testing
peer review
sample size
(00:15) - Introduction
(00:44) - Can Hot Tubs Replace Exercise?
(01:27) - Crazy Runners and Crazy Training
(05:44) - The Amazon Delivery System Metaphor
(12:12) - From Heat Training to Hot Tubs
(13:33) - The Study: 10 Runners in Hot Water
(22:31) - Results and the VO2 Max Question
(29:26) - Statistical Sleuthing: Best Subsets Regression
(36:50) - The Peer Review Problem
(41:39) - Rating the Claim
Methodologic Morals
“A model can be very good at answering the wrong question.”
“The label ‘peer reviewed’ does not guarantee ‘carefully reviewed’.”
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör
Regina Nuzzo and Kristin Sainani. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Regina Nuzzo and Kristin Sainani och inte av,
eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.