Your succession slate looks full — names, readiness ratings, green boxes, development plans, all on schedule. So why does the bench feel thin the moment a board member asks who on this list has actually run anything?
Here's the mechanism. Org flattening didn't just cut cost; it deleted the leadership pipeline hidden inside your org chart. Those messy-middle roles were where future operators learned to run something with real consequences attached — and when they were removed in the name of AI efficiency, the development function went with them, off the books. Your readiness ratings survived the system that made them mean anything. And with boards now planning AI-driven headcount cuts of up to 20%, it's about to happen again, faster.
In this episode, Jackson Lynch gives you four plays to fix it: run the board's question against your own slate, force the talent math into org design before the boxes get drawn, convert freed-up AI capacity into deliberate proving grounds, and split span of control into supervision capacity and development capacity. You'll walk out able to rerun the succession math before the next round of cuts locks in the damage.
Subscribe to The Talent Sherpa Podcast for weekly conversations on talent strategy, org design, and CHRO leadership. If this hit, listen next: Your AI Rollout Is Missing the Work.
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör
Jackson O. Lynch and Scott Morris. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Jackson O. Lynch and Scott Morris och inte av,
eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.