What does “suitable” really mean for a critical worker under section 9A of the Enhanced CIRMP Rules 2026?
In this episode, Marina Shteinberg and Tim Slattery explore who makes the suitability decision, who owns the risk, and how ongoing assurance should work in practice.
We examine the three pathways to critical component access — AusCheck plus the responsible entity’s suitability assessment, a relevant NV1+ security clearance, and the CIRMP risk-managed pathway — and explain what each pathway establishes, who makes the key decisions, and what responsibility remains with the organisation.
We also look at ongoing suitability, the relationship with insider threat capability, and practical implementation outcomes for organisations preparing for the enhanced personnel security requirements under section 9A.
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör
Pentagram Advisory. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Pentagram Advisory och inte av,
eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.
