Thirteen months of Google's search data is worth roughly seventeen years of Bing's. That single number explains why Google's search business is now under pressure from four directions at once—the DOJ's antitrust remedy, the EU's Digital Markets Act, the UK's CMA, and the proposed US SEARCH Act. Now that Google is required to share its search data with competitors, the question turns to whether such sharing can be done in a way that is privacy safe. Do PETs offer a solution? Is this simply a place where privacy interests and competition interests are perpetually at odds? Is this simply another opportunity for Google to delay? Alan Chapell sits down with Alissa Cooper of the KGI to discuss the DOJ search remedies, the EU Digital Markets Act, privacy, AI, and what search data sharing could mean for competition and innovation
Alissa Cooper’s bio can be found at: https://kgi.georgetown.edu/people/alissa-cooper/
The Chapell Regulatory Insider can be found at: https://chapellreport.substack.com/
Takeaways
Why regulators want Google to share search data
Privacy vs. competition in search
How AI is changing the data-sharing debate
Why independent oversight is essential
Chapters
00:00 Introduction
03:24 Why Google Must Share Search Data
08:35 Comparing Global Regulations
16:06 What Search Data Includes
19:34 Privacy Concerns
32:20 Independent Oversight
43:00 Final Takeaways
50:05 Closing Remarks
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör
Alan Chapell. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Alan Chapell och inte av,
eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.
