The Video Doesn't Show What Happened — Ian Renshaw & Keith Davids Review Schütz, Betsch & Plessner (2026), with guest Scott Russell

An emergency episode: VAR was dominating the World Cup news cycle, and a paper had just landed asking the exact question everyone was arguing about. Ian Renshaw and Keith Davids review Schütz, Betsch & Plessner's "The Impact of Video Speed on Intention Attribution" (Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 2026) — four experiments showing that slowing footage down increases how intentional an action looks, peaking at around 1.5 seconds before easing off again.

For the first time on a theory paper episode, they bring in a guest: Scott Russell, a former referee now researching how officials incorporate social expectations into their decisions. Keith reframes the paper's cognitive explanation through an ecological lens — it's not just processing time, it's a change in the structure of information available to the viewer. Scott argues that video, even in real time, is never the event itself, just "the best artist's impression." Ian draws on his own occlusion research to show how arbitrary a single video frame really is. And the conversation lands on practical recommendations: closed, specific questions for VAR reviews, standard-speed footage as the default for disciplinary decisions, and rugby league referee Ashley Klein's decision to uphold a send-off despite video review as a model for trusting the on-field call.

A timely, sharp look at why the frozen frame keeps lying to us in the same direction, every time.

---

If you're getting value from our podcast check out our membership options and coaching community at [www.theconstraintscollective.com](https://www.theconstraintscollective.com) where you can access podcast summaries, narrated presentations, early release podcasts and monthly online meet ups with experts from the Constraints Collective.