Life Science Talent Talks
Avsnitt

E69 #Ecosystem Builders "Denmark's Biotech Potential: Innovation Gaps, Capital Challenges & National Frameworks" with Morten Engsbye

Dela

In this podcast episode on turning research into societal value, host Søren Spanner Bach is joined by co-host Per Christensen of Black Swans Exist and guest Morten Engsbye, CEO of Danish BIO (Dansk Biotek) - the industry association representing over 190 pharmaceutical and industrial biotech companies in Denmark. Morten shares candid reflections on why Denmark, despite being Europe's #2 nation for per-capita life sciences publications, consistently underperforms at translating that world-class research into new companies - and what it will take to fix it.

Key structural challenges discussed include the cultural gap between academic excellence and entrepreneurial ambition, the scarcity of early-stage capital as late-stage companies attract the lion's share of investment, and Denmark's 42% capital gains tax making biotech investment unattractive compared to property or neighbouring Sweden. In a world premiere, Morten also unveils Danish BIO's proposal for direct cash grants to university departments that successfully spin out companies - a mechanism designed to make innovation a leadership priority at department level, not just an individual pursuit.

Morten also sounds the alarm on Denmark's GDP dependency on a small number of blockbuster drugs - life sciences now accounts for approximately 60% of all Danish GDP growth - and makes a compelling case for unlocking the country's 4.5 trillion DKK in pension fund assets, currently investing just 0.018% into venture compared to 1.9% in the US. His closing message: Denmark is a life sciences nation in every metric that matters. It just hasn't realised it yet.


TIMESTAMP

00:00 Morten Engsbye and Danish BIO

02:00 The Translation Gap: World-Class Research, Not Enough Companies

03:00 Why Other Countries Are Better at Spinning Out Science

06:00 World Premiere: Danish BIO's Department-Level Spin-Out Incentive Proposal

09:00 Freedom vs Mandates: Why Incentives Beat Obligations

11:00 Genmab, Myelomatosis & What Biotech Success Really Looks Like

13:00 The GDP Time Bomb: When Patents Expire, Markets Collapse

17:00 The Capital Crisis: $2.1 Billion to Bring a Drug to Market

19:00 A Schizophrenic Capital Market: Late-Stage Flush, Early-Stage Starved

20:00 Where Should the Capital Come From? The Draghi & Letta Reports

21:00 Capital Gains Tax: 42% in Denmark vs 27% in Sweden

23:00 Pension Funds: 4.5 Trillion DKK Doing Very Little for Denmark

24:00 The 100x Gap: US vs European Pension Funds in Venture

26:00 Ferrari vs Denmark: One Fund's Investment Priorities

29:00 Forcing vs Incentivising Pension Funds: The Italian Model

30:00 Why It Should Be a Slam Dunk — Jobs, Patients, Returns

34:00 Denmark as a Life Sciences Nation — and Why Politicians Don't See It

36:00 Call to Action for Academics and Department Leaders

40:00 Brain Drain: How Danish Taxpayer-Funded Research Ends Up in Boston


Quote:

"We pay for the research. They build the company here. Then, because there's no capital market, they leave for Boston — pay their taxes there, create all the jobs there. And we sit back holding the bill."— Morten Engsbye


Ideas for future podcast guests or themes? 💡

We want to co-create this podcast with you. We’d therefore love to hear your suggestions for future podcast guests, ecosystem builders, or deep tech themes.


Feel free to share in a private message or leave a comment below 🙏🏼

(It's also ok to invite yourself 😉)


Call to Action

If this episode sparked your interest:

Share it with someone working in science, startups, or innovation

Follow the miniseries for more conversations with ecosystem builders

Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör Life Science Talent Ecosystem. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Life Science Talent Ecosystem och inte av, eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.