Send us a message about this episode!

Six-month ERP implementations get a bad name because most "six-month" projects are really twelve-month projects with a six-month deadline glued onto the front. The software is rarely the problem. The problem is everything around it — decisions, data, scope creep, and the unwillingness to go standard.

In this episode, Pete, Emily, and Nirav walk through the five conditions that have to be true for a six-month ERP implementation to actually finish in six months.

What we cover:

  • Why a reliable internal team that can make decisions quickly is the difference between six and twelve months
  • How to spot whether your business is actually simple enough for a fast implementation — and what kills it (integrations, special pricing rules, custom reports)
  • The case for going standard with a clear MVP, and why customisation tolerance should be near zero
  • What to look for in a VAR who will challenge you instead of just nodding along
  • How to know if you've picked the right ERP for the timeline you want

If you've been handed a six-month deadline and you're trying to work out whether it's achievable or whether someone's set you up to fail, this one's for you.

Support the show

👋 JOIN THE CONVERSATION:
Have you experienced an ERP data migration, or are you planning one? Share your thoughts, experiences, or ask questions in the comments section below. We’d love to hear from you!

🔔 STAY IN THE KNOW:
Enjoyed the content? Subscribe to our channel and hit the bell icon to stay updated on the latest episodes. We bring you expert insights, valuable tips, and real-world case studies from the ERP realm and beyond!
#ERPTips  #BusinessProcesses 

Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör Peter Nicholson | Nirav Shah | Emily Browning. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Peter Nicholson | Nirav Shah | Emily Browning och inte av, eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.