Six-month ERP implementations get a bad name because most "six-month" projects are really twelve-month projects with a six-month deadline glued onto the front. The software is rarely the problem. The problem is everything around it — decisions, data, scope creep, and the unwillingness to go standard.
In this episode, Pete, Emily, and Nirav walk through the five conditions that have to be true for a six-month ERP implementation to actually finish in six months.
What we cover:
Why a reliable internal team that can make decisions quickly is the difference between six and twelve months
How to spot whether your business is actually simple enough for a fast implementation — and what kills it (integrations, special pricing rules, custom reports)
The case for going standard with a clear MVP, and why customisation tolerance should be near zero
What to look for in a VAR who will challenge you instead of just nodding along
How to know if you've picked the right ERP for the timeline you want
If you've been handed a six-month deadline and you're trying to work out whether it's achievable or whether someone's set you up to fail, this one's for you.
👋 JOIN THE CONVERSATION: Have you experienced an ERP data migration, or are you planning one? Share your thoughts, experiences, or ask questions in the comments section below. We’d love to hear from you!
🔔 STAY IN THE KNOW: Enjoyed the content? Subscribe to our channel and hit the bell icon to stay updated on the latest episodes. We bring you expert insights, valuable tips, and real-world case studies from the ERP realm and beyond! #ERPTips #BusinessProcesses
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör
Peter Nicholson | Nirav Shah | Emily Browning. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Peter Nicholson | Nirav Shah | Emily Browning och inte av,
eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.