The grip that gender ideology has on the law is one of the most consequential ways in which it governs our affairs. Indeed, when obvious lies about the basic facts of our humanity rule the day, chaos ensues. And in the family courts, that ruthlessness is accentuated in light of the way it disrupts and severs our most intimate relationships.
In the bonus episode for season 3 of this podcast series, we profiled Ted Hudacko, a dad whose ordeal is a case study as to how gender ideology takes over one’s life. To briefly recap, in violation of a court order which required that he be notified and give consent to any gender identity-related surgery, doctors at a major gender center at the University of California - San Franscisco carried out so-called "gender-affirming care," performing a surgical procedure that inserted a hormone-blocking device in his then-minor son’s arm. They also started his son on a course of cross-sex hormones. In light of this violation, Hudacko took legal action both in a family court complaint and in a federal lawsuit.
When gender ideology pervades the law, the normal rules do not seem to apply., It appears that, as Hudacko’s case has illustrated, they seem to make it up as they go along. And when there is a messy divorce and questions of custody? These bitter, protracted fights never seem to end.
In the bonus episode of season 4, we are revisiting this legal jungle, full of all kinds of twists and turns.
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör The Christian Post. Innehållet i podden är skapat av The Christian Post och inte av, eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.
