First, the plaintiff agreed to rent a room in the defendant's house. The defendant always brought home strange women, so the plaintiff had to move out. The defendant refuses to return her security, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff moved out without any notice and damaged the carpet. Therefore, he had every right to keep the security deposit.

Then, the plaintiff stored her televisions at the defendant's house. When she went to retrieve them, the defendant said they were stolen, but the plaintiff believes the defendant had something to do with it, so she's suing. The defendant says he went out of his way to help the plaintiff, and he denies the allegations.

Plus, the plaintiff claims the defendant damaged his vehicle's bumper outside a hospital, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant says the plaintiff is making this all up and just assumed he caused the damage.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Rss Apple Podcaster
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör The People’s Court Podcast. Innehållet i podden är skapat av The People’s Court Podcast och inte av, eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.