In this episode, Dr. Mark Ettensohn examines the circular logic that often appears in popular “narcissistic abuse” discourse and how it can create a closed system for interpreting other people’s behavior.
The episode begins with a pattern Dr. Ettensohn has repeatedly encountered online: once someone concludes that another person is a narcissist, virtually any response can become further evidence of narcissism. Disagreement becomes an inability to tolerate criticism. Anger becomes narcissistic rage. Denial becomes DARVO. Withdrawal becomes the silent treatment. An apology becomes manipulation or hoovering. Even evidence that contradicts the original conclusion can be reinterpreted as proof that the narcissist has successfully deceived others.
Dr. Ettensohn argues that this creates an essentially unfalsifiable framework. If both an accusation and its denial can be treated as evidence of guilt, there is no independent standard by which the original interpretation can be tested or revised. Rather than asking what explanation best accounts for another person’s behavior, the process begins with a conclusion and assembles evidence around it.
Drawing on his experience conducting psychological assessments, Dr. Ettensohn discusses how this reasoning can persist even when a person does not meet criteria for Narcissistic Personality Disorder or pathological narcissism. He explores how the extensive vocabulary of popular narcissistic-abuse content can encourage people to infer hidden motives and psychological states from ambiguous behavior while becoming increasingly resistant to alternative explanations.
The episode also challenges the widespread conflation of pathological narcissism with abuse. People with NPD can behave abusively, but abusive behavior does not itself establish the presence of pathological narcissism. Recent research has likewise raised questions about treating pathological narcissism as a general explanation for intimate partner abuse.
Ultimately, the discussion asks a basic epistemological question: If every possible response can be interpreted as evidence that someone is a narcissist, what evidence could ever show that the conclusion was wrong?
References:
Day, N. J. S., Kealy, D., Biberdzic, M., Green, A., Denmeade, G., & Grenyer, B. F. S. (2025). Coercive control and intimate partner violence: Relationship with personality disorder severity and pathological narcissism. Personality and Mental Health, 19(4), e70038.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/pmh.70038
⸻
Additional Resources
Website: https://healnpd.org
Newsletter: https://healnpd.substack.com
Purchase Unmasking Narcissism: A Guide to Understanding the Narcissist in Your Life: https://amzn.to/3nG9FgH
LISTEN ON APPLE PODCASTS: https://rb.gy/cklpum
LISTEN ON AMAZON MUSIC: https://rb.gy/g4yzh8
About Heal NPD
Heal NPD is a clinical practice specializing in the assessment and treatment of pathological narcissism, Narcissistic Personality Disorder, and related personality difficulties. We provide comprehensive diagnostic assessments, individual psychotherapy, and consultations for partners and family members.
Learn more or inquire about services: https://healnpd.org
