My guests today are Laura Delizonna, Stanford instructor and executive coach, and Daniela Landherr, Head of Talent Engagement at Google in EMEA.
In this episode we discuss a question that has been preying on mind for quite a while: Why is psychological safety so attractive in theory and yet so rare in practice?
Topics we explore:
- Why psychological safety is both crucial and fragile and how it’s the answer to an evolutionary-based question: “Are you for me or are you against me?”
- The shift we need to make from putting it all on the leader to create psychological safety to “we can all make it or break it” — as individuals we have more power than we think we do to create the feeling of “I feel safe with you” through every interaction we have
- How do we actually know how psychologically safe our team is and why as a leader you’re likely the worst judge of that. What are the clues that signal high and low psychological safety?
- “The obligation to dissent” as key to psychological safety and how we can approach conflict as a call for curiosity and an opportunity to co-create a new solution vs. a zero-sum game.
You can read Laura’s famous Harvard Business Review article about why high-performing teams need psychological safety and how to create it here; and can gather more insights from her website. Check out Daniela’s website, a real source of inspiration and empowerment.
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör
Alina Costache. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Alina Costache och inte av,
eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.