Australia’s crypto industry is moving into a stricter regulatory phase. ASIC Consultation Paper 392 sets out proposed guidance and standards for digital asset platforms and tokenised custody platforms ahead of the new regime commencing in April 2027, covering licensing, client assets, trading, settlement and financial requirements.
Peter speaks with Michael from StormRake about what the consultation means for exchanges, brokers and everyday Australian crypto users. They unpack AFSL applications, the cost of compliance, the gap between more than 300 AUSTRAC-registered entities and roughly 140 licence applicants, and whether smaller operators may leave the market.
The discussion also covers bank restrictions on crypto payments, privacy, peer-to-peer transactions, self-custody trade-offs and why both industry participants and consumers should engage with the consultation while the proposed standards can still be shaped.
Chapters: 0:00 Why Australia’s Crypto Industry Is Worried 1:28 What ASIC Consultation CP392 Changes 3:05 Exchanges, Brokers and Digital Platforms 4:26 April 2027 and AFSL Requirements 5:17 The Cost of Crypto Compliance 7:26 Consumer Protection or Tax Control? 9:53 Privacy and Peer-to-Peer Crypto 13:02 Who Is Driving the Regulation? 15:19 Banks Blocking Crypto Payments 20:03 What Australian Users Can Do 24:51 Making the Consultation Count 29:11 Why Local Support Still Matters
What you'll learn: - ASIC Consultation Paper 392 proposes guidance and operational standards for digital asset platforms and tokenised custody platforms ahead of the April 2027 regime. - Crypto exchanges and brokers may be captured as digital asset platforms and require appropriate Australian financial services licensing. - More than 140 entities have reportedly applied for an AFSL, compared with more than 300 crypto businesses previously registered with AUSTRAC. - Licensing can require months of internal work, external advice, system changes and ongoing compliance staff, creating a heavier burden for smaller operators. - Fewer licensed platforms could reduce competition and consumer choice even as the framework aims to improve safeguards for client assets and trading. - Australian users are already experiencing bank restrictions on some crypto-related payments, which the discussion links to institutional risk settings. - Self-custody can reduce reliance on platforms but introduces its own security and recovery risks, so it is not a simple answer for every user. - The consultation gives industry participants and the public an opportunity to comment before ASIC finalises detailed guidance and standards.
Disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only. Nothing constitutes financial advice.
DISCLAIMER: This content is for informational and educational purposes only and is not financial, investment, or legal advice. I am not affiliated with, nor compensated by, the project discussed—no tokens, payments, or incentives received. I do not hold a stake in the project, including private or future allocations. All views are my own, based on public information. Always do your own research and consult a licensed advisor before investing. Crypto investments carry high risk, and past performance is no guarantee of future results. I am not responsible for any decisions you make based on this content.
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör
Pete Bui. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Pete Bui och inte av,
eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.
