Scientific papers preserve the happy path and lose the abandoned experiments and arguments that produced it. Starting with Alasdair Russell's genome editing group at the CRUK Cambridge Institute, Nathan Benaich examines whether scientific search histories could teach AI research taste. The essay explains why logs are not automatically training data, how selective labels hide the outcomes of rejected experiments, and what autonomous laboratories and Registered Reports can contribute. From Air Street Press. Subscribe at press.airstreet.com, read the State of AI Report at stateof.ai, and leave a rating - it helps the show.

Rss Apple Podcaster
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör Nathan Benaich (Air Street Capital). Innehållet i podden är skapat av Nathan Benaich (Air Street Capital) och inte av, eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.