"You're on the receiving end of a coordinated PR campaign." - Jonathan
80% CSAT wins trophies. That's a problem.
What does it actually take to win an industry award worth winning? Jonathan Harrop has been on both sides: he's judged at the Drum Awards and spent years at AdColony running a $6 million global marketing budget that produced over 200 wins across Ad Age, MMA, Smarties, Adweek, and the Drum. He knows how winning entries are built, what judges are really looking for, and where the whole system falls apart.
This episode is not a takedown of awards culture, nor is it a defense of it. It is a sharp, honest account of how the game actually works, from AI-written entries getting zeroed out in jury rooms to government budget claims that defy how policy actually moves. Jonathan also pulls back the curtain on Forbes 30 Under 30, pay-to-play structures, reader polls as legitimacy theater, and the one signal that probably tells you more about a vendor than any trophy ever will.
Timestamps
02:05 — The Networking Case for Showing Up: Even if you only make the shortlist, attending the ceremony is worth it; the room is full of peers you'd otherwise never meet.
03:05 — Reverse-Engineering What Judges Want: The submitter seat teaches more than the judge seat because winning at scale forces you to systematically decode what passes the first filter before an entry ever reaches a judge.
04:32 — AI Entries Getting Zeroed Out: Judges are now zeroing out entries that read as AI-generated because reused winning phrases signal zero effort, and effort is exactly what judges are supposed to be rewarding.
14:38 — Operationalizing an Awards Campaign: Jonathan breaks down the full process of building a winning submission, from early result tracking to video case studies and cost management, and what it actually takes to scale a program to 200-plus wins on a limited budget. The unglamorous version.
22:45 — Company Awards Are Sales Tools: Best-places-to-work and technology innovation awards are fundamentally sales assets, a sticker for a deck that a salesperson shows a buyer, not signals of genuine excellence the way campaign awards are.
28:45 — DM9 vs. Havas: Which Is Worse? DM9 fabricated evidence and was caught; Havas Costa Rica's "Lessons of Shame" claimed a $73M budget shift and the reshaping of four presidential platforms. None of which could be verified. The award still stands. The case that wasn't caught may be the more dangerous precedent.
38:22 — Rating Manipulation Is Everywhere: App stores, review platforms, and survey flows are routinely engineered to funnel satisfied users toward public ratings and dissatisfied users toward private feedback, making most star-rating signals structurally gamed.
48:35 — Perception Is Reality in Awards: Winning awards cements your credibility as a leader in ways that are hard to replicate. The system's flaws don't cancel that out.
Sponsor
Brought to you by Hightouch, the leading composable CDP and decisioning platform trusted by brands like Domino's, Chime, and Aritzia. 90% of customers have a real use case live within their first week, delivering world-class personalization at scale. Learn more at hightouch.com/msom.
Connect & Subscribe
Subscribe to Making Sense of Martech wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us on TikTok, LinkedIn, and don't forget to like and subscribe on YouTube.
