In this video, we look at R. L. Solberg’s approach to Scripture by focusing on his mishandling of Matthew 5:17–20. Rather than considering the immediate context, Solberg ignores it completely and appeals to other, unrelated texts to argue that Jesus could not have meant what he said in this passage. This eisegetical approach raises serious doubts about his reliability as a biblical interpreter.
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör
David Wilber. Innehållet i podden är skapat av David Wilber och inte av,
eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.
