Tony says it first and he never lets it go: Under the Silver Lake is the most frustrating movie he has ever been forced to sit through. That reaction kicks off a surprisingly deep argument between us about what a movie owes its audience, and what “subversive” even means when the story seems determined to dodge emotion, consequences, and clarity.
We walk through the film’s conspiracy thriller setup in Los Angeles and the endless trail of codes, symbols, and “solve me” breadcrumbs. Dan loves the mood and the idea that the hunt itself is the point, a mirror for how we chase meaning in pop culture, music, and celebrity myth. Tony thinks that approach is a cheat: if the movie mocks the audience for looking for answers while still stuffing the frame with clues, it becomes the exact kind of smug Hollywood puzzle it pretends to critique.
Then we get into the harder stuff: the male gaze, misogyny, and why satire fails when the film never draws a line or shows a real counterpoint. We also debate craft at the nuts-and-bolts level, from stakes and pacing to why a great score can’t save a story that refuses to care about its own setup. By the end, we are not just reviewing a neo-noir mystery, we are arguing about modern filmmaking, audience trust, and what “a real movie” feels like.
If you enjoy movie podcasts, hate watch debates, and brutally honest film criticism, hit subscribe, share the episode with a friend who loves puzzle movies, and leave a review. Are you with Dan on the vibe, or with Tony on the fundamentals?
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör
Dan Goodsell and Tony Czech. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Dan Goodsell and Tony Czech och inte av,
eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.