The “Minimal Facts” argument is often presented as the most reliable, evidence-based case for the resurrection—built only on what even skeptical scholars accept. But how strong is that foundation, really? Researcher Michael J Alter examines the famous “90% consensus” claim, the data behind it, and whether it holds up under scrutiny.
Michael Alter resources - https://amzn.to/4sFnI5I https://amzn.to/4bKqgYY https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360566228_Dataset_Analysis_of_English_Texts_Written_on_the_Topic_of_Jesus'_Resurrection_A_Statistical_Critique_of_Minimal_Facts_Apologetics https://www.shermjournal.org/articles/evidence-based-analysis-of-english-texts-written-on-jesus’-resurrection
Receipts for claims in the video - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Z1J0JQp4tpZCJqyyZyFsxVTTjeiCinYg/view?usp=sharing
Support Paulogia at http://www.patreon.com/paulogia http://www.paypal.me/paulogia
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör
Paulogia. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Paulogia och inte av,
eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.