Thirty years ago, John Horgan had a dream—or rather a nightmare. Here and there, scientists were saying that all the major problems of the universe had essentially been solved, and that the work of the future was just going to be filling in the details of what we already knew.
But those voices were largely drowned out in the generation of scientists who came of age promoting radical new ideas that they claimed would push their disciplines far beyond what was then-currently known. Despite their creators’ claims, however, ideas like string theory, quantum consciousness, and chaos theory, were unable to generate actual testable ideas and inventions.
Had scientific progress stalled? Is it possible that there are real limits on what humans can ever know because of the type of beings that we are? This was the thesis of John’s book, The End of Science, which was published in 1996.
The book was instantly controversial, and he was fired from Scientific American because of it. And yet in the intervening 30 years, many of the exact same people he had profiled are still promoting the same unproductive ideas.
Is it accurate to say that science is stalled out though? That’s why I wanted to talk with John about the book, and where he sees things in 2026, especially now that one of America’s two major parties has rebuilt itself around attacking science and secular knowledge.
The video of this conversation is available. Access the episode page to get the full transcript. You can subscribe to Theory of Change and other Flux podcasts on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Podcasts, YouTube, Patreon, Substack, and elsewhere.
Related Content
—Science fiction and the authoritarian imagination
—Thinking outside Schrödinger’s cat box: Reality as quantum
—Chatbots aren’t conscious, but it’s important to understand the science and philosophy of why
—In Silicon Valley, creationists and atheist post-libertarians have a lot in common
—Why thinking about aliens can help us better understand philosophy of science
—Why the far-right’s wars on science and sex are linked
—Trump super fans are impossible to argue with because they don’t believe in traditional logic 🔒
—Mental qualia are real, but they create experiences, rather than being created by them
Audio Chapters
00:00 — Introduction
14:51 — Isn’t all science just a type of philosophy?
25:14 — Peter Thiel’s claim that scientific progress has stalled
31:33 — Why science has such difficulty understanding consciousness
38:08 — The tension some religious believers feel with consciousness research
49:02 — Jeffrey Epstein’s obsession with scientists
53:20 — The fragility of the postwar liberal consensuses, and why they were taken for granted
About the Show
Theory of Change is hosted by Matthew Sheffield about larger trends and intersections of politics, religion, media, and technology. It's part of the Flux network, a new content community of podcasters and writers. Please visit us at flux.community to learn more and to tell us about what you're doing. We're constantly growing and learning from the great people we meet.
Theory of Change on Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheoryChange
Matthew Sheffield on Social Media
Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@mattsheffield
Twitter: https://twitter.com/mattsheffield
Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/matthew.flux.community
Threads: https://www.threads.net/@realmattsheffield
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit plus.flux.community/subscribe
