Business Pants
Avsnitt

IN OR OUT: SpaceX earnings, Uber sex assault, governistas, meritocracy

Dela

DR

Matternet Appoints Starbucks EVP Sanjay Shah to Board of Directors

Developer of commercial drone delivery systems for urban and suburban environments

CEO/founder Andreas Raptopoulos: M.A. in Industrial Design Engineering; Diploma of Imperial College in Industrial Design Engineering; Diploma in Mechanical Engineering

Chris Dawson: M.B.A. from INSEAD.

Sanjay Kotte: B.B.A. in finance and management; M.B.A. and J.D.

Laurence Marton, M.D.: expert in drug development, polyamine metabolism, and cancer research,

Saurabh Ranjan: certification in human resource and law; M.A. and M.B.A.

No female directors or executives but now a second Sanjay: IN OR OUT

Sanjay Shah: B.S. in Mechanical Engineering

Starbucks Chief Supply Chain Officer

SVP of Operations, Gopuff

COO, Beyond Meat

SVP, Tesla

VP of North American Customer Fulfillment, Amazon

AAON Increases Board Size and Appoints Robert L. Buttermore III, and Patrick J. Jermain as Independent Directors

Before 2/9 F now 2/11 F

AAON manufactures heating, ventilation, and air conditioning equipment for commercial and industrial indoor environments

 IN OR OUT: Robert L. Buttermore III: BS mechanical engineering

Chief Supply Chain Officer of Rockwell Automation, one of the world’s leading industrial automation and digital transformation companies

previously led Rockwell’s Power Control business and oversaw strategic expansion initiatives supporting industrial, semiconductor, energy, HVAC, and data center customers.

 IN OR OUT: Patrick J. Jermain: MBA

Former CFO Plexus

Administration and Management: 100%. The others:

Caron A. Lawhorn: former CFO, ONE Gas, Inc.

Stephen O. LeClair: MBA, Chair/former CEO, Core & Main

Bruce Ware: MBA, CEO, One America Bancorp Inc., a financial institution that he founded to provide niche financial and banking services

Uber’s Strategy for Fighting Sexual Assault Suits: ‘What Were You Wearing?

IN OR OUT on the board skillset: Consumer and Digital Experience: “Background in the development and improvement of consumer experiences with a company’s products, services, and brand, including through a digital interface.” AND Sustainability and Human Capital Management: “Experience in corporate responsibility, human capital management, and managing sustainability initiatives.”

Who is in BOTH?

Arora: CEO, Palo Alto Networks (cybersecurity); Softbank

Burns: Former CEO/Chair Xerox; currently invests in tech

Eckert: Partner at PE firm; former CEO Mattel

Ginsberg: Partner at PE firm; former CEO Match Group

Khosrowshahi: CEO; former CEO Expedia

Sugar: Former CEO Northrop Grumman (war); Apple: Foxconn suicide machine

Wynaendts: former CEO Aegon (life insurance); Deutsche bank

IN OR OUT on Chief Legal Officer Tony West: “Why safety is personal to me

Uses past public service as a human shield for his current corporate ruthlessness: West spends roughly a third of the statement reciting his resume (prosecuting child exploitation, doing pro bono work for domestic violence survivors, and overseeing the Office on Violence Against Women under Obama) which is why “I would never support or condone conduct—inside or outside a courtroom—that fails to treat women and survivors with dignity and respect”

West was a chief architect and defender of Uber's ruthless campaign to pass Proposition 22 in California. Uber and other gig companies spent hundreds of millions of dollars to exempt themselves from state labor laws, ensuring their drivers remained classified as independent contractors without a minimum wage, healthcare, or sick leave.

Blames “the system:” “I’ll be the first to say that our adversarial legal system can be particularly tough for survivors. By its nature, the trial process is designed to extract facts ... And the fact that all of this occurs in public view makes it all the more difficult …” 

“The system" isn't asking victims what they were wearing—Uber’s highly paid defense attorneys are

West is shifting the blame from his own legal department's aggressive, victim-blaming litigation strategies onto the abstract concept of the "adversarial legal system."

the New York Times and unsealed court documents from the multidistrict litigation (MDL) reveal, once a survivor steps into a courtroom, Uber’s high-priced defense lawyers resort to classic, traumatizing victim-blaming. Asking women what they were wearing or weaponizing their personal histories to discredit them is a deliberate strategy to minimize corporate payouts

Cherry picks one favorable moment: West quotes a single federal judge from a February trial who praised Uber’s attorneys, saying they did not engage in "the slightest bit of shaming" and that he wanted it "clear on the record."

one favorable quote from one judge in one specific trial: "Look, this one guy said we're nice, so the New York Times must be lying."

Bullshits the bigger picture: “Uber was among the first companies to end forced arbitration and mandatory confidentiality agreements in matters involving sexual assault and sexual harassment”

Yes, they ended individual forced arbitration, but they fought ruthlessly to ensure survivors still cannot form class-action lawsuits. Forcing victims to fight Uber one-on-one is a massive legal advantage for the company

Lies about ESG data: “Uber was also the first—and continues to be one of the only—companies to voluntarily and consistently publish data on the reports of sexual assault”

They published "safety data," but as the Times revealed, they hid hundreds of thousands of complaints by categorizing them as "unaudited" or "less serious."

While Uber publicly reported a few thousand incidents, internal documents showed they received over 400,000 reports of sexual assault or misconduct between 2017 and 2022.

Jefferies ESG chief says investors overstate SpaceX governance risks

Aniket Shah, Jefferies' global head of sustainability: Investors who avoid SpaceX because of Elon Musk's extraordinary control over the company may be letting governance concerns outweigh potential long-term returns

"The idea that there's an — in quotes — acceptable form of good governance" is one that "I highly question," Shah said. "People who try to put governance into some kind of straight-jacket are too simple-minded and, frankly speaking, not looking at data."

“Investors who rely on governance checklists alone risk overlooking companies capable of generating substantial long-term returns, particularly founder-led businesses that concentrate decision-making power in a single executive.”

IN OR OUT on SpaceX? Did he change your mind?

Does this help change your mind? 

Bill Ackman Says "Never Bet Against Elon," Even as He Passes on SpaceX Stock. Here's Why He's Staying Out.

IN OR OUT on SpaceX? Did Bill change your mind?

IN OR OUT based on this headline:Mark Zuckerberg Says AI Will Create An 'Infinite' Instagram: outlined a vision where AI-generated content becomes a third major source of content

Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan’s school is the latest billionaire education experiment to collapse: The Primary School closed after nearly a decade, following disappointing outcomes and a shift in the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative’s philanthropic priorities from social advocacy toward scientific philanthropy

The Primary School was a passion project for Chan, who regularly visited the campus, read books to kindergartners, and appeared in a curriculum video with Sesame Street’s Elmo

Despite her hands-on approach, the school struggled with some of its nontraditional elements

Teachers, for instance, were required to sign nondisclosure agreements, and the school experienced high turnover among principals.

Finding the right curriculum and policies also proved challenging as administrators tried to determine the best approach to teaching students.

Chan told The Wall Street Journal last year: “The outcomes just weren’t where [the board] would have wanted them to be or, frankly, anyone would have wanted them to be.”

IN OR OUT on the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative?

MM

IN OR OUT: Your AI strategy isn’t failing because of bad design. It’s because your team doesn’t believe in you

Which is more likely - the team is rejecting AI or the messenger?

In which case, IN OR OUT round - if you were employed by the following, and they said you were going to execute an AI strategy, you buying or selling?

Mark Zuckerberg

ALL IN BABY!  FIRE EVERYONE! SELL

Jamie Dimon

“Total redeployment” BUY

Bill Brown, CEO at 3M

Ask3M - product innovation using AI (talk to a chatbot and get ideas I think?) SELL

Kelly Ortberg, CEO at Boeing

“Intelligence” - enhance spec drawings and productivity?  They’re not going deep on AI yet, no money BUY

Brian Cornell, Target not-CEO-but-actually-CEO

One bullet: Using data and technology in new ways to strengthen inventory planning, improve in-store consistency and enhance guest interactions SELL

SpaceX's first-ever earnings report comes with stock under pressure: Q2 preview

Straight up, IN OR OUT - buying SpaceX with it cheap or selling?

Elon Musk still runs it like an uncontrolled dictator with sycophants surrounding him!

Aniket Shah says you shouldn’t be so parochial about that or you’ll miss “generational wealth event” like with Facebook, because Facebook was good for everyone!

Musk rumored to be building an entire telco (or buying one) because his personal net worth can afford to buy him Verizon and still have almost $800bn left over!

Everyone calling this a “test”, but it doesn’t matter since the only thing you can do is buy or sell!

Meritocracy claims make managers pay men more than equally qualified women

IN OR OUT: MEN OR WOMEN

Starbucks CEO Earns 1,794 Times More Than the Average Worker: Here's Why He's Paid $31M

IN or OUT

The turnaround strategy is working - Niccol made more than any other restaurant CEO per share, stock is up!

Starbucks pay committee is a mess of overpaying, interconnected directors: Ritch Allison (chair) bats .249 on pay ratio, Andy Campion bats 0.041, Mike Sievert 0.067, Neal Mohan 0.031.  These are literally the among the highest paying directors in the database - so did he earn it or do these people not care and pay egregious amounts?

ALL the execs make a lot - is it a good sign when all the execs get PAID, since they’re making money in stores?

Not EVERYONE is making money - Starbucks not only regressed its offer to the union, they sued them to no longer use the Starbucks logo (which is so fucking petty), and Niccol refused to negotiate with them at first and excluded them from the bonus pool

Stock is up 20% YTD, 15% in last year!  Beating the S&P (slightly)!

Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör Free Float Media Inc.. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Free Float Media Inc. och inte av, eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.