“In the end, it’s the economic majority of users who decide what Bitcoin is.”

Wicked and MrHodl join the show to break down why BIP110 won’t change Bitcoin.

We get into the fight over arbitrary data on Bitcoin, why they believe BIP110 fails to solve the problem it claims to address, and why miner signalling alone does not define consensus. The conversation covers Bitcoin Core, Knots, the blocksize war, SegWit, BIP148, spam, soft forks, hard forks, nodes, miners, exchanges, and the role of the economic majority in defending Bitcoin’s rules.

Is BIP110 a serious proposal, a virtue signal, or an attempted replay of old battles? And if Bitcoin can be changed without broad consensus, what does that mean for decentralisation?

THANKS TO OUR SPONSORS:

ANCHORWATCH

BLOCKWARE

LEDN

BITKEY

SWAN

CAPE

FOLLOW:

Danny Knowles: https://x.com/\_DannyKnowles or https://primal.net/danny

MrHodl: https://x.com/MrHodl

Wicked: https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin

Rss Apple Podcaster
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör Danny Knowles. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Danny Knowles och inte av, eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.