Callaway spent three days saying it was disappointed by an ad. Then its CEO admitted Callaway approved that ad before it was posted.
This episode is about the gap between those two statements, and what a company reveals when it comments on its own conduct as though it were in the audience for it.
A content warning first: the episode discusses domestic violence as an image used in a golf brand campaign. Nobody in this story is accused of real-world violence. The scene was staged. What two companies chose to make, approve and publish is the story.
Then the read nobody in the golf feed has: Good Good is not a golf company. It is a media company that raised forty-five million dollars to become one, and the ad was not a lapse in judgment. It was the formula working the way it was paid to work.
0:00 — Why the communication is the story 0:31 — Three days of being disappointed 1:58 — The parody, described once 4:07 — Who approved it? 7:42 — Statement one: "disappointed by the content that was posted" 8:42 — The PGA Tour calls the response late and defensive 11:08 — Good Good is not a golf company 12:35 — Where the formula came from 18:39 — Statement two: "approved by Callaway prior to posting" 23:04 — A premiere moves at a sponsor’s request 24:17 — Forty-five million dollars 26:24 — "A 360-degree media company" 27:09 — The formula worked the way it was paid to work
The PR Breakdown with Molly McPherson.
👇 Stay Connected 📧 Weekly Substack Lives and Newsletter [https://mollymcpherson.substack.com/]
This video is for educational and commentary purposes only. Some links may be affiliate links. Sponsorships are always disclosed in-video. Videos are based on publicly available information unless otherwise stated.
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör
www.mollymcpherson.com. Innehållet i podden är skapat av www.mollymcpherson.com och inte av,
eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.