Pastor Ben Hayter of Imanuel Lutheran Church in Waterloo, IL, joins the show to work through the CTCR's 2025 document, Unity in Doctrine, Uniformity and Variety in Practice. The document came from a 2019 synodical resolution asking the CTCR to define what Article III.7 of the LCMS Constitution actually means by "unity in doctrine and uniformity and variety in practice." The CTCR responds with six historical case studies — the Jerusalem Council, the Quartodeciman controversy, Luther's Invocavit Sermons, the adiaphoristic controversy behind Formula of Concord Article X, and two episodes from LCMS history: the Synod's founding and the debate over lay electors and women's suffrage.
Hayter raises three unresolved questions the document leaves on the table. First: the difference between how to use adiaphora and whether something actually is adiaphora in the first place — a hermeneutical question of whether church practice requires an explicit command or whether necessary inference is sufficient warrant. Second: definitional looseness around key terms like "responsible," "required," "insist," and "retain" — words that carry very different weight depending on who's doing the requiring, God by His Word or the Synod by human right. Third: even once something is settled as adiaphora, the document doesn't resolve which practices are wise and which are foolish to adopt — that work is left to pastors and congregations, argued from Scripture rather than mere preference.
The conversation lands on a practical charge: use this document as a starting point for real conversation among brother pastors — in circuit Winkels, district boards, and eventually Synod conventions — grounded in reasons drawn from Scripture and the Confessions, not personal whim.
Topics covered:
- Background on CTCR study documents and Resolution 5-11 (2019 convention)
- The six case studies: Jerusalem Council, Quartodeciman controversy, Luther's Invocavit Sermons, the adiaphoristic controversy, the Synod's founding, lay electors/women's suffrage
- The hermeneutical question: explicit command vs. necessary inference in determining adiaphora
- Defining loaded terms: "responsible," "required," "retain," "insist"
- Whether a practice being adiaphora settles whether it's wise to use
- Next steps: Winkel discussions, district conventions, and synodical bylaws as means of working this out
----more----
Host: Fr. Jason Braaten
Guest: Fr. Ben Hayter
----more----
Become a Patron!
You can subscribe to the Journal here: https://www.gottesdienst.org/subscribe/
You can read the Gottesblog here: https://www.gottesdienst.org/gottesblog/
You can support Gottesdienst here: https://www.gottesdienst.org/make-a-donation/
As always, we, at The Gottesdienst Crowd, would be honored if you would Subscribe, Rate, and Review. Thanks for listening and thanks for your support.
