The ONS Podcast
Avsnitt

Episode 437: Precision Oncology: What We've Learned and What's Ahead

Dela

"Biomarker testing isn't just about generating more information. It's about answering very practical questions for our patients. Can we identify disease earlier? Can we understand whether treatment is working? Are we able to identify why a cancer has become resistant? Ultimately, I think that's where precision oncology becomes very meaningful. It's not about the molecular report sitting in the chart. It's about taking that information and using it to make the best possible decision for our individual patients," ONS member Erica Bello Rodriguez, MSN, AGNP, NP-C, AOCNP®, oncology nurse practitioner and supervisor of advanced practice providers at Northwell Health Cancer Institute in Westchester, NY, told Katie Hubbard, MSN, RN, OCN®, NPD-BC, oncology clinical specialist at ONS, during a conversation about precision oncology.

This podcast episode was produced by ONS and is sponsored by AstraZeneca. ONS is solely responsible for the criteria, objectives, content, quality, and scientific integrity of its programs and publications.

Music Credit: "Fireflies and Stardust" by Kevin MacLeod

Licensed under Creative Commons by Attribution 3.0 

Episode Notes 

To discuss the information in this episode with other oncology nurses, visit the ONS Communities. 

To find resources for creating an ONS Podcast club in your chapter or nursing community, visit the ONS Podcast Library.

To provide feedback or otherwise reach ONS about the podcast, email pubONSVoice@ons.org.

Highlights From This Episode

"Some of the most important developments since 2020 have really been broader than any single variant or drug. We've seen precision oncology evolve from simply identifying a genomic alteration to developing a much more comprehensive understanding of what is driving an individual's cancer and how we can act on that information. One major development has been the expansion and accessibility of comprehensive biomarker testing and next-generation sequencing. We're able to identify more of the molecular characteristics of a tumor, and those findings can increasingly help inform treatment decisions and clinical trial opportunities for our patients. We've also seen the continued evolution of tumor agnostic therapy, which represents a really important shift in how we think about cancer treatment." TS 3:52

"Nurses have become increasingly important as a translator and advocate. Genomic reports are incredibly complex, and patients don't necessarily understand terms such as 'pathogenic variant,' 'actionable biomarker,' or 'tumor agnostic therapy.' Nurses are often the people who have meaningful relationships with the patients, and they have to take that complex science, simplify it, and highlight it for them. ... The science is becoming more precise but the need for a nurse to make that science understandable and patient-centered is becoming even greater." TS 7:12

"I'm really excited about circulating tumor DNA, or ctDNA. For example, I think about a patient with stage III colon cancer who has completed treatment with curative intent. Her scans may look completely clear and clinically, she looks great, but we're beginning to use ctDNA to look for molecular residual disease. Essentially, we're trying to determine whether there may be microscopic disease present that we just can't see on imaging yet. For that patient, a positive ctDNA result could tell us that there may still be disease at a molecular level, even though the computed tomography (CT) scan looks normal to us. It also has the potential to help us monitor disease over time, understand treatment response, and identify emerging resistance. I think that's really exciting because historically, we thought about biomarkers more as a snapshot. With ctDNA, we're beginning to think about biomarkers as something we can follow longitudinally. I think it's important to acknowledge that we're still learning exactly when ctDNA results should change treatment, but the potential is enormous." TS 9:09

"We have incredible biomarker-driven treatments, but not every patient has equal access to comprehensive testing, genetic counseling, clinical trials, or the therapies a biomarker may identify. Access can vary based on geography, insurance coverage, the healthcare system, and many other external factors. So one of the challenges is making sure that precision oncology doesn't become something that's only available to patients who have the resources to navigate the system. We really need to work on helping those that don't have as much access." TS 18:14

"If I had to summarize where I think we're headed, I would say we're moving from precision oncology being a snapshot of a patient's cancer to something much more longitudinal. ... We're going to be better at understanding what's driving the cancer, how it's changing, how it's responding, and hopefully intervening earlier and more precisely. Ultimately, I think the goal is to not just give more information, but to provide better decisions and better outcomes for our patients." TS 24:36

Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör Oncology Nursing Society. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Oncology Nursing Society och inte av, eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.