Join this channel to get access to our two bonus shows each week:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYO4pKCDPdqlsUfDOtuq-zQ/join
Dortmund had no excuses after Bodø/Glimt, and Nico Kovac had no answers. 😬
Nico Kovac and Waldemar Anton both blamed intensity rather than the artificial pitch. So why did Dortmund look so flat until the 60th-minute substitutions? We break down Kovac's tactical gamble: the inverted wing-backs, the crowded flanks, the rotated line-up after the Bremen draw, and why Felix Nmecha and Julian Ryerson changed the game off the bench.
In this video:
• Why Dortmund blamed themselves, not the conditions
• Kovac's 3-4-3 with inverted wing-backs (Beier left, Svensson right) and why it didn't work
• The four changes at 60 minutes and the late push for an equaliser
• Why Bodø/Glimt is such a hard place for visiting teams
• Which players are struggling: Beier, Bellingham, Wiemann and more
• What the awkward Champions League away trips mean for Dortmund's season
• A tough Bundesliga trip to Union Berlin ahead
👍 Like and subscribe for more Bundesliga and Champions League analysis.
💬 Was Kovac wrong to rotate? Tell us in the comments.
Listen to the show for free: https://tinyurl.com/2e6brkh8
Listen to the show ad-free + two bonus shows a week: https://tinyurl.com/jh6up2ee
Buy Gegenpressing merch: https://gegenpressing.myshopify.com
Read our newsletter: https://tinyurl.com/2tac23p9
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör
Gegenpressing. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Gegenpressing och inte av,
eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.