Law professor Julian Nyarko has drawn attention for his studies using large language models to investigate and improve legal education and explore AI’s biases. He hopes AI can become a reliable, always-on legal learning and assistance tool to lower costs and expand access to legal services. In one recent study, he asked a group of law professors to evaluate written answers to student questions. Three-quarters of the time, the professors preferred AI-generated answers to those of their human colleagues. “AI is good at law,” Nyarko says, the challenge now is to use it most effectively, he tells host Russ Altman in this episode of Stanford Engineering’s The Future of Everything podcast.

Have a question for Russ? Send it our way in writing or via voice memo, and it might be featured on an upcoming episode. Please introduce yourself, let us know where you're listening from, and share your question. You can send questions to thefutureofeverything@stanford.edu.

Episode Reference Links:

Connect With Us:

Chapters:

(00:00:00) Introduction

Russ Altman introduces guest Julian Nyarko, a professor of law at Stanford University.

(00:02:31) Path into AI and Law

How Nyarko’s early work led him to legal AI.

(00:05:03) Law, Economics, and Computation

How Nyarko’s training, methods, and self-taught coding shaped his research.

(00:07:23) Building the LIFT Lab

Why a law professor started a lab.

(00:09:06) Evaluating Legal AI

How AI raises fundamental questions about what counts as good lawyering.

(00:10:22) Improving Legal Services

Using AI to work faster, reduce errors, and make informed decisions.

(00:10:57) Rethinking Legal Education

How AI may change the way future lawyers learn 

(00:11:51) AI in Office Hours

How AI answers law students’ questions compared with human professors.

(00:15:18) Surprising Results

Why AI answers were often preferred 

(00:16:16) What the Study Shows

The findings support AI tutoring, but don’t prove AI improves learning.

(00:18:48) Limits of One-Shot Answers

Why real teaching often depends on dialogue, clarification, and productive struggle.

(00:20:59) AI for Social Science

How AI can become both an object of study and a tool.

(00:22:43) Research Agents

Using AI to test claims and make previously impossible research scalable.

(00:24:51) Agentic AI in the Lab

How Socratic dialogue with AI can sharpen research ideas.

(00:26:07) Fairness and Bias

How computational tools can be audited for bias and used to audit decision-making.

(00:27:29) Discrimination in Models

Exploring bias and how it can be reduced.

(00:30:16) Disparate Impact

How policies and systems disadvantage groups even without explicit intent.

(00:32:53) From Evidence to Policy

How Nyarko’s lab works with stakeholders to surface disparities.

(00:34:49) Future In a Minute

Rapid-fire Q&A: justice, talent, and the future of legal AI.

(00:36:57) Conclusion

 

Connect With Us:

Episode Transcripts >>> The Future of Everything Website

Connect with Russ >>> Threads / Bluesky / Mastodon

Connect with School of Engineering >>>Twitter/X / Instagram / LinkedIn / Facebook


Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör Stanford Engineering. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Stanford Engineering och inte av, eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.