We love shortcuts, especially when hiring feels risky, messy, and expensive. So we lean on certifications, not as inputs, but as answers.
This episode of the PM Debate Podcast takes on a belief that still shapes hiring decisions every day: that certification equals competence.
What makes this debate interesting isn’t the conclusion, it’s the actual arguement.
On one side:Certifications are knowledge checks, useful, even if incomplete. They can’t tell you how someone behaves when things go sideways.
On the other:Certifications were never meant to predict success. They were meant to establish a baseline, and the failure is in how we misuse them.
Here’s the bottom line: Most organizations don’t actually know how to assess competence.
Hiring managers often default to proxies.
This conversation is a reminder that real capability shows up in judgment, context, and execution, none of which fit neatly on a resume.
🎧 Listen to Episode 28 if you want a sharper lens on:
* Hiring risk vs. hiring comfort
* Why project failure gets oversimplified
* What competence really looks like in practice
Question to listeners:What’s the most misleading signal you’ve seen used to judge a project manager?
Thanks for reading Project Management Matters! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
Get full access to Project Management Matters at philipdiab.substack.com/subscribe
