Counting to 5
Avsnitt

Episode 052: Livestream — Voter Purges and Political Badges

Counting to 5
Dela

Welcome back to Counting to 5, a podcast about the United States Supreme Court.


In this episode, I explain the Court’s new decisions in five argued cases, including Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute, the case about the legality of Ohio’s process for removing names from the voting rolls.



Show Notes
Correction:

Toward the end of this episode, I stated that the Chief Justice appoints judges to the Judicial Conference of the United States. This was an error. The Judicial Conference is actually composed of the Chief Judge of each Circuit Court of Appeals and a District Court elected by the judges of each circuit.


News and Developments:

Washington v. United States:



Justices’ Financial Disclosure Reports:



Opinions in Argued Cases:

China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh:



Sveen v. Melin:



Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute:



Animal Science Products, Inc. v. Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.:



Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky:



Next Livestream:


Counting to 5:



This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit countingto5.substack.com

Rss Apple Podcaster
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör Countingto5. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Countingto5 och inte av, eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.