This week's episode covers two criminal cases with bickering concurrences. Rahimi v. U.S., holding that the Second Amendment does not invalidate a law disarming someone subject to a domestic violence restraining order, shows that a lot can happen in two summers, while Smith v. Arizona, holding that an expert witness cannot testify about a report the expert did not prepare, shows that twenty years is still not enough time to decide what testimonial means. Law starts at (02:22).
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör The Citizens Guide to the Supreme Court. Innehållet i podden är skapat av The Citizens Guide to the Supreme Court och inte av, eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.
