This week's episode covers two criminal cases with bickering concurrences.  Rahimi v. U.S., holding that the Second Amendment does not invalidate a law disarming someone subject to a domestic violence restraining order, shows that a lot can happen in two summers, while Smith v. Arizona, holding that an expert witness cannot testify about a report the expert did not prepare, shows that twenty years is still not enough time to decide what testimonial means.  Law starts at (02:22).

Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör The Citizens Guide to the Supreme Court. Innehållet i podden är skapat av The Citizens Guide to the Supreme Court och inte av, eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.

Senast besökta

The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court

50 Shades of Originalism

00:00